rednose RNS10S Legacy Donating Member 2,229 Member For: 20y 1m 14d Gender: Male Posted 20/03/16 05:21 AM Posted 20/03/16 05:21 AM Absolutely nothing down low... And that torque....
bamk2f6tornado Legacy Donating Member 777 Member For: 12y 9m 27d Gender: Male Location: Rockhampton Qld Posted 20/03/16 05:30 AM Posted 20/03/16 05:30 AM Cpv have had a Gt3582 in the high 400's on a ba engine with just Springs and e85 obviously. I think I remember him saying it could have gone 500 if he pushed it
JETURBO ...JD TUNING ADELAIDE... Legacy Donating Member 23,708 Member For: 18y 3m 30d Gender: Male Location: Adelaide Posted 20/03/16 05:41 AM Posted 20/03/16 05:41 AM (edited) When you start to sacrifice first half of a graphs power it does get added to the top half ( not proportional ) the losses down low are what will make or break a car's overall performance how many times I've had a heaps nicer tune with lower numbers outweighs any of the bigger number tunes ever driven a car with a "big turbo" ? Absolutely the biggest hunks of snot on the street and will get spanked by a 300kw FG turbo everytime from 0-120 apples for apples a GT82 tuned to 400 on E85 will have a stronger torque span than one pushed north of 470 "if" it could happen remember we want to achieve the maximum "average" power/torque not a graph that looks like a hill ( ie my posted dyno graph above ) true story Edited 20/03/16 05:43 AM by JETURBO 2
rednose RNS10S Legacy Donating Member 2,229 Member For: 20y 1m 14d Gender: Male Posted 20/03/16 05:44 AM Posted 20/03/16 05:44 AM 100% agree, power under the curve for a strong street car
JETURBO ...JD TUNING ADELAIDE... Legacy Donating Member 23,708 Member For: 18y 3m 30d Gender: Male Location: Adelaide Posted 20/03/16 05:56 AM Posted 20/03/16 05:56 AM To be fair Arron your car has made 395 and it's manual and at 20+psi it's pretty much the limit of the stock GT82 bang a ZF behind that engine and it's 380rwkw ...... 2
arronm Dropping a turd Legacy Donating Member 9,520 Member For: 18y 11m 4d Gender: Male Location: Perth Posted 20/03/16 06:16 AM Posted 20/03/16 06:16 AM Steady 18psi thankyou. And it made more just cant find the graph. And a bit more on P100. About 417 if I remember. Whatever you think you must agree it holds boost nice.... not many graphs I have seen where the boost just doesnt fall into a hole.
rednose RNS10S Legacy Donating Member 2,229 Member For: 20y 1m 14d Gender: Male Posted 20/03/16 06:21 AM Posted 20/03/16 06:21 AM Eflex, eboost off, bg1 and bg2 Car went 134MPH on that bg2 tune
arronm Dropping a turd Legacy Donating Member 9,520 Member For: 18y 11m 4d Gender: Male Location: Perth Posted 20/03/16 06:31 AM Posted 20/03/16 06:31 AM (edited) No RPM , No torque, no max torque and power RPM. Makes it hard for any comparisons. What is eflex???? Edited 20/03/16 06:33 AM by arronm
JETURBO ...JD TUNING ADELAIDE... Legacy Donating Member 23,708 Member For: 18y 3m 30d Gender: Male Location: Adelaide Posted 20/03/16 06:39 AM Posted 20/03/16 06:39 AM How much drugs have you taken today lukes mate ? 1
Lennox Member 2,586 Member For: 13y 7m 4d Gender: Male Location: Perth Posted 20/03/16 06:48 AM Posted 20/03/16 06:48 AM Cant find my latest one but this this is close enough. Factory F6 turbo on my F6. Both cars are manual.The Nizpro car has high comp built motor so will luv the E85. I cant be bothered with E85. With this much power why would I bother changing my turbo. Just over 400rwkw is enough for me.. But the boy want high 400s Now I see why you're mcdrift fat torque curve all the way up
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now