None.  I know you dont believe in information on the dyno graph. No rpm for you either. Come on its 2016, get with the program.

 

Compare these. Why dont you just fill in the blanks.. If you look at my power and RPM of the before and after runs  it becomes obvious what has been changed.

 

 

Edited March 20, 201610 yr by arronm

On 20/03/2016 at 5:31 PM, arronm said:

No RPM , No torque, no max torque and power RPM. Makes it hard for any comparisons. What is eflex????

DD doesn't give you both, need to select one or the other, they're both logged you just select which one to display.

Eflex is e70, and what do you want to compare???

Yours is manual mine is auto.

 

Yours should have more power than mine down low cause shorter gearing but yet it doesn't.

Maybe cause your on 98.

Arron u muppet that car has a GTX for one and was out of pump for two so it was wound right back 

 

This was my F6 on 98 with everything thrown at it ... It's all it would make on 98 

 

I always compare power and torque at RPM. You dont have it so it cant be done. Kph is useless because auto and manual are different. We dont have E70 and we only have 6 x E85 stations. Pretty useless....

 

On 20/03/2016 at 6:02 PM, rednose said:

 

Yours should have more power than mine down low cause shorter gearing but yet it doesn't.

Maybe cause your on 98.

 

With the lack of information on your graph how can you even start to compare. RPM will not be the same at the same road speed.

22 minutes ago, JETURBO said:

Arron u muppet that car has a GTX for one and was out of pump for two so it was wound right back 

 

This was my F6 on 98 with everything thrown at it ... It's all it would make on 98 

 

I wasnt commenting on the graph, just the lack of information. Just the same with yours. What you can see is at 120kph rednose was making over 325rwkw and you were making 160rwkw. that's if you both have 6 speed auto and the run was done in fourth, but because no RPM who knows......

SHOOT 8F   ?????????????????

Edited March 20, 201610 yr by arronm

Not comparing, auto vs manual is no match, I'd leave you behind like you were standing still

that's nice....

Arronm, I don't compare dyno graphs as they don't mean too much, car can run a number on one dyno and then run up more or less on another dyno.

Arron it's clear you struggle with reading dyno graphs 

have you noticed yours has RPM and speed ...... 

My run starts slower than George's , it's how spiro uses his dyno, different to others 

this is an overlay of a ZF ( highest kw ) vs T6060 ( FG manual ) 

check the road speeds each run goes to 6200rpm 

 

True.....

 

But its a good tool for measuring gain. I started with 212 and ended up with 417

 

On 20/03/2016 at 6:46 PM, JETURBO said:

Arron it's clear you struggle with reading dyno graphs 

have you noticed yours has RPM and speed ...... 

My run starts slower than George's , it's how spiro uses his dyno, different to others 

this is an overlay of a ZF ( highest kw ) vs T6060 ( FG manual ) 

check the road speeds each run goes to 6200rpm 

 

I know exactly how to read a graph. that's why RPM is needed to be included. Road speed is irrelevant. Cars dont make peak torque and power at a road speed they make it  at an RPM. But obviously you customers dont care, just look at the number. But for me I want to know is the car laying over at 5000rpm or is it  making power until 5800 -6000rpm

 

So if georges car is a 6 speed auto and run in 4th then your graphs can be overlayed.