k31th less WHY; more WOT Site Developer 30,098 Member For: 18y 5m 7d Gender: Male Location: Melbourne Posted 28/01/19 12:06 PM Posted 28/01/19 12:06 PM yep, thanks to both you and me for the suggestions, hence the forum can take his $20 ahha 1
Puffwagon Legacy Donating Member 16,348 Member For: 11y 7m 19d Gender: Not Telling Posted 28/01/19 12:08 PM Posted 28/01/19 12:08 PM Haha yeah just kidding bro.
masda74 To Loud Legacy Donating Member 4,114 Member For: 14y 9m 18d Gender: Male Location: WA, Perth Posted 29/01/19 05:00 AM Posted 29/01/19 05:00 AM @Ozkart13, thanks for the update. Gapping in the spark plug had to be increased for E85? Surely with a gap of 0.7 it should ignite the fuel still? Also you still running the same boost for E85 aren't you? So why does changing the gapping from 0.7 to 1.0 fix the issue? Puff?
Puffwagon Legacy Donating Member 16,348 Member For: 11y 7m 19d Gender: Not Telling Posted 29/01/19 05:04 AM Posted 29/01/19 05:04 AM 17 hours ago, Ozkart13 said: plugs regapped from 1mm to 0.7mm and the engine is running 100%. Short version = new coils and new plugs gapped to 0.7mm = win 2 minutes ago, masda74 said: So why does changing the gapping from 0.7 to 1.0 fix the issue? Puff? Ya just looked at it wrong mate.
masda74 To Loud Legacy Donating Member 4,114 Member For: 14y 9m 18d Gender: Male Location: WA, Perth Posted 29/01/19 05:06 AM Posted 29/01/19 05:06 AM yep, you are right. ignore this senile old fart.
Ozkart13 Member 32 Member For: 13y 6m 25d Posted 31/01/19 12:13 PM Author Posted 31/01/19 12:13 PM More boost and fuel going through it on e85 tune hence why the environment inside the cylinder was a bit too dense/rich for ignition. I'm keeping my money though for the next flatbed I have to pay for... Ford life
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now