Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Member
  • Member For: 22y 9m 1d
Posted

Gavin I think you will find that the formula of squaring the speed will hold fairly well above 80km/h.

At slow speeds other losses will make a big difference and economy is normally best at around 80- 90 km/h in top gear.

I think at 150 km/h 22.5 l/100km would be about right and at 200km/h you would be close to 40l/100km.

I dont have an XR6T but could some one who has been at these speeds (on a private road or track) post their results. Get a passenger to check the readout once you have stopped accelerating and have held the speed for a short while.

9 l/100km at 95km/h is approximately correct so even if the units are wrong as we are working with ratios the formula will work above 80km/h.

  • Member
  • Member For: 22y 10m 24d
  • Location: Vic
Posted
Buy a Prius if you really care how much fuel it uses - gotta have it.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I agree,

Why buy a turbo and quible about the fuel consumption. If you have to think about the fuel consumption every time you hit the accelerator, then buy something else.

Economy is inversly proportional to fun.

I have a lot of fun, some months my fuelcard account shows 20l/100km

Forget about the economy and enjoy your car.

  • Member
  • Member For: 21y 11m 3d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: NSW
Posted

Can any one coment on fuel economy from a stock ute to a phase 2 aps kit., Im getting avg 16L/100 around town, 700kms to a tank when I drove to melbourne and it shoots up over 20L/100 when I cain it- well you get that on the Ts.

The aps gear should help with fuel economy, so I have been told if you drive it normal, but would like to hear it 1st hand?

:blink:

  • Member
  • Member For: 22y 9m 5d
  • Location: secret harbour western australia
Posted

I found that at 100kph I will get 10l/100ks

150kph.............14/100ks

160kph..............15100ks

I Know this from a 1600klm run in country wa with the cruise control on .(bog standartd xr6t with 3000ks on clock )

Dave

  • Member
  • Member For: 22y 9m 1d
Posted (edited)

that's a bit better fuel consumption than I predicted at speed. Other constant losses must be the important factor.

At 100 km/h you got 10l/100km

so at 150 km/h 22.5l of fuel would be used in the same time but as 150 km is covered we divide by 1.5 and get 15l/100 to reality of 14l/100km

so at 160 km/h 25.6l of fuel would be used in the same time but as 160 km is covered we divide by 1.6 and get 16l/100 to reality of 15l/100km

I am glad you got 10l /100km at 100km/h as it makes the maths much easier!!!

Sorry in my previous post I meant to say :-

I think at 150 km/h 22.5 l/150km would be about right and at 200km/h you would be close to 40l/200km.

Edited by colbourne
  • Legacy Donating Member
  • Member For: 22y 11m 13d
  • Location: gippsland
Posted

I reset the fuel thing at Airyes Inlet

2.5 hours later on hwy and fwy at a 100ks

9.9l per 100kls

I thought that was pretty good :blink:

  • Crusty aviator
  • Member
  • Member For: 22y 3m 8d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: ACT
Posted

I recall seeing a thread which took the pi$$ out of a Monaro's fuel consumption and showed a photo of its 'Range to Empty' reading on the dash readout with a full tank showing less than 400km.

Just got back from 3500km trip ACT-QLD-ACT using Newell Highway, New England and Oxley and when I filled up after the last leg take a look at the photo (attached) which shows the Range to Empty reading at 809km!!

Now remember that is with APS Phase II fitted (and used!) and .

Well done the T and Peter at APS....270RWKW and economy to match (average with about 400km of City stuff was 10.8l/100km actual not indicated).

Dingah

  • Crusty aviator
  • Member
  • Member For: 22y 3m 8d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: ACT
Posted

Oh ye of little faith!

When the photo was taken I had just refilled and had a little over 1/4 of a tank remaining prior to the refill with the trip mileage shown on the right completed - so I would expect to get close and that was not only highway driving either.

Dingah

  • Seriously Flukey Member
  • Legacy Donating Member
  • Member For: 22y 6m 6d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Melbourne
Posted

Dingah, great result and I dont mean to shoot you down, but my understanding is that once injectors are changed, all your trip/ fuel figures are no longer accurate <_<

Could be wrong...

  • In Your Face
  • Member
  • Member For: 23y 6m 18d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Peninsula
Posted
but my understanding is that once injectors are changed, all your trip/ fuel figures are no longer accurate <_<

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

That is true :k24t:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...