rollex Member 683 Member For: 12y 3m 12d Gender: Male Location: Australia Posted 12/09/17 04:10 AM Posted 12/09/17 04:10 AM (edited) Problem with return less is you have a lot more things to go wrong. A simple mechanical fuel regulator is much simpler and will maintain a stable pressure with basically no setup. I like Ralphs setup, eg a return pump system but with a pump speed regulator so you aren't running it at full speed at idle. Very simple but best of both worlds imo, only con is you retain the return fuel line, but not really that big a deal. Ralph I have an idea, retain the return fuel system but setup a speed signal from the PCM (eg enable return fuel flow) with no pressure sensor attached, I'm sure you could effectively turn it into a dumb speed controller where it winds the speed down at low loads. Then you don't need an external speed controller like you have now. Edited 12/09/17 04:11 AM by rollex
Ralph Wiggum Moar Powar Babeh Legacy Donating Member 19,334 Member For: 20y 11m 28d Gender: Male Location: Perth Posted 12/09/17 04:32 AM Author Posted 12/09/17 04:32 AM External speed controller I have now is built into the Reg. No pressure sense for pressure control bothers me.
rollex Member 683 Member For: 12y 3m 12d Gender: Male Location: Australia Posted 12/09/17 05:00 AM Posted 12/09/17 05:00 AM Sounds pretty simple then. Would there really be any benefit to using a return-less mustang style one then?
Ralph Wiggum Moar Powar Babeh Legacy Donating Member 19,334 Member For: 20y 11m 28d Gender: Male Location: Perth Posted 12/09/17 05:46 AM Author Posted 12/09/17 05:46 AM Reduced cost if all you need is a pwm controlled pump, PCM Speed control signal output and a FPS.
eff xr6t Member 569 Member For: 12y 11m 21d Posted 12/09/17 06:46 AM Posted 12/09/17 06:46 AM Would still require a solid state relay for running the pump? Unless the PCM has a decent output capable of the current draw?
Boosting_G6E Member 103 Member For: 10y 7m Posted 12/09/17 07:31 AM Posted 12/09/17 07:31 AM (edited) 7 hours ago, DarrylC said: Ford does use a returnless system in one fuel type in the Australian Falcons. It can be done. Only available in PCMTec Hah and I think I own one actually haven't bothered to do a thing am tempted to buy the sct x4 for sale but ford tune is pretty spot on from factory I can't believe I said that hah a far more advanced system than ALL your xr6t's running "heavy duty" side feed v10 viper injectors face palm Edited 12/09/17 07:40 AM by Boosting_G6E
Puffwagon Legacy Donating Member 16,348 Member For: 11y 7m 22d Gender: Not Telling Posted 12/09/17 08:17 AM Posted 12/09/17 08:17 AM 3 hours ago, Ralph Wiggum said: No pressure sense for pressure control bothers me. You already have a vacuum/boost signal controlling pressure. Chuck a fpg next to your boost gauge and you can see it from the cabin. It'd actually be a pretty handy street tuning addition. 2 hours ago, Ralph Wiggum said: Reduced cost if all you need is a pwm controlled pump, PCM Speed control signal output and a FPS. And a fuel rail including fittings, labour and tuning for those that can't do it themselves. It's an interesting concept for discussion but it in my ohmo opinion just a reg and intank walbro (without taking into account surge issues) would take care of better than 99% of applications and is still cheaper. Do it though. You could build your own unit from some arduino related stuff that could control the pressure and flow pretty easily I imagine.
Boosting_G6E Member 103 Member For: 10y 7m Posted 12/09/17 08:22 AM Posted 12/09/17 08:22 AM what powers Ralph running / pump set up I guess it's just the price we got to pay though a noisy pump at idle hah but for your own car it would be nice addition to show your skills
Puffwagon Legacy Donating Member 16,348 Member For: 11y 7m 22d Gender: Not Telling Posted 12/09/17 08:27 AM Posted 12/09/17 08:27 AM 4 minutes ago, Boosting_G6E said: what powers Ralph running All of it jk. Yep it has it's merits and if he can sort something out with it then it will be interesting to see in action.
Boosting_G6E Member 103 Member For: 10y 7m Posted 12/09/17 08:29 AM Posted 12/09/17 08:29 AM ya would be very nice would even keep the heat of the fuel down marginally but how many "customers" would opt for this option?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now