Kosij Donating Members 2,045 Member For: 12y 8m 16d Gender: Male Posted 06/03/13 10:30 AM Share Posted 06/03/13 10:30 AM Yeah I bet my lack of luck it was :/ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rednose RNS10S Donating Members 2,229 Member For: 17y 8m 10d Gender: Male Posted 06/03/13 10:42 AM Share Posted 06/03/13 10:42 AM Hahahahhahah funny thing is my statement is facts that were gathered from a reputable tuner!Ask your reputable tuner if my twin 2.5 inch flows enough to make 406 rwkw on a mainline.Jason, I will not state something if I do not know its a fact.Fact is there are plenty of cars that make more power than your claimed 320 and your current 385 with a twin 2.5 inch x-force exhaust.Not sure what the argument is about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kosij Donating Members 2,045 Member For: 12y 8m 16d Gender: Male Posted 06/03/13 10:44 AM Share Posted 06/03/13 10:44 AM Who's arguing? I'm stating the issues I had an the op can take in what he wants. Maybe you & others like running extreme exhaust temps IDK..... But bigger IS better so 3.5" trumps twin 2.5" 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rednose RNS10S Donating Members 2,229 Member For: 17y 8m 10d Gender: Male Posted 06/03/13 10:45 AM Share Posted 06/03/13 10:45 AM just call Brownnose exhaust shop kosij. they know there stuff.. LolHe has, numerous times, just like you. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rednose RNS10S Donating Members 2,229 Member For: 17y 8m 10d Gender: Male Posted 06/03/13 10:47 AM Share Posted 06/03/13 10:47 AM Who's arguing? I'm stating the issues I had an the op can take in what he wants. Maybe you & others like running extreme exhaust temps IDK..... But bigger IS better so 3.5" trumps twin 2.5"You are steering the OP in the wrong direction if you claim that the twin 2.5 inch will run out at 320. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Never had any say Panda I <3 Floods Silver Donating Members 11,198 Member For: 12y 8m 26d Gender: Male Location: South West QLD Posted 06/03/13 10:49 AM Share Posted 06/03/13 10:49 AM Who's arguing? I'm stating the issues I had an the op can take in what he wants. Maybe you & others like running extreme exhaust temps IDK..... But bigger IS better so 3.5" trumps twin 2.5" I think you'd find the difference in flow area between the two is negligible.. It's only if you start considering pipe surface resistance does the twin get out performed by the single. I'd bet your bad luck too you had one with dodgey rear muffler :-P Though I guess another consideration would be ground clearance.. Doesn't the twin 2.5" tuck up better under the car? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rednose RNS10S Donating Members 2,229 Member For: 17y 8m 10d Gender: Male Posted 06/03/13 10:52 AM Share Posted 06/03/13 10:52 AM But bigger IS better so 3.5" trumps twin 2.5Then why not go a 4 or 5 inch? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f6mark Member 2,908 Member For: 13y 2m 12d Gender: Male Posted 06/03/13 11:08 AM Share Posted 06/03/13 11:08 AM oh dear pinknose.. Lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigAl's04 Special needs member. Bronze Donating Members 690 Member For: 13y 7m 20d Gender: Male Location: gold coast Posted 06/03/13 11:10 AM Share Posted 06/03/13 11:10 AM http--,,--// 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f6mark Member 2,908 Member For: 13y 2m 12d Gender: Male Posted 06/03/13 11:11 AM Share Posted 06/03/13 11:11 AM He has, numerous times, just like you.pinknose. I call CES exhaust for a 3.5 with twin dump Bro. never call Brownnose . Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now