*cocks

test

cocks

cocks

edit J@ ya tosser it's not even censored farken

Edited 20/01/14 11:10 AM20/01/14 11:10 AM by sexual harrassment panda

Dammit

Cock

whataco(k

So any thought on my spelling infested post oh wise gods ?

I haven't actually read it

http://www.evoxforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=28036

44 pages, I think your answer might be in there somewhere, tell me when you find it cause I'd like to know more.

That read will keep your minds off cocks.

So let me get this straight. The FG has this venturi valve cause it has the split fuel tank under the seat and it needs this valve to pull fuel over the driveshaft hump into the primary tank with the pump in it.

I take it the BA/BF has no venturi valve cause just a single tank.

So if you put in say a Walbro 400lph intank pump in a FG, then the valve relief is a bit small and you could drill it out and it would still pull out fuel out of the otherside of the tank provided you don't overdrill it and get the correct pressure out of the FPReg.

Most swirl tanks will use a venturi to keep the pot full whilst the surrounding tank is low....to prevent surge.

Trana the fg tank is same/same to b series

Correct toads hence why I think its important to not use this place to have less restriction

The effect imho would be destroyed or less efficient if the hole ( first one ) was just drilled out

I feel a pressure realease needs to come into effect either before or after but not to disrupt the first vital venturi effect !!

Has anyone had the chance to look at what kpm have come up with to address the issue? I know they supply a fuel reg but surely they have done something with the swirl pot?