Johnny G Team Grandpa Qualified Legacy Donating Member 809 Member For: 21y 7m 8d Gender: Male Location: Brisbane North. Posted 14/09/09 03:54 AM Posted 14/09/09 03:54 AM Guys - this is buried in a couple of threads - thought it might be good to post under it's own heading:Exhaust pipe cross sectional area reference list…... a fast guide.(Calculated mathematically using Pi. Area = Pi x r^2 assuming Pi to three decimal places. Does not take into account actual inside pipe diameter – reference gauge for accuracy. Remember - with twin systems there will be a minimal double loss due to ID variation. Exhaust gas flows in weird and wonderful ways, and changes it’s flow characteristics with temperature drop and change in direction.)Single 3” system:R = 3/2R^2 = 2.25Area = 1 x (Pi x 2.25) = 7.069 square inchesTwin 2.25” system:R = 2.25/2R^2 = 1.266Area = 2 x (Pi x 1.266) = 7.955 square inchesSingle 3.5” system:r = 3.5/2r^2 = 3.0625Area = 1 x (Pi x 3.0625) = 9.622 square inchesTwin 2.5” system:r = 2.5/2r^2 = 1.5625Area = 2 x (Pi x 1.5625) = 9.818 square inchesSingle 4” system:R = 4/2R^2 = 4Area x 1 x (Pi x 4) = 12.568 square inches
tab Sucker Moderating Team 32,303 Member For: 22y 4m 27d Gender: Male Location: Brisbane Posted 14/09/09 04:07 AM Posted 14/09/09 04:07 AM Good work Johnny...thread pinned
civillian Legacy Donating Member 78 Member For: 22y 4d Gender: Male Location: Canberra Posted 30/10/09 08:55 AM Posted 30/10/09 08:55 AM Single 3.5” system:r = 3.5/2r^2 = 3.0625Area = 1 x (Pi x 3.0625) = 9.622 square inchesTwin 2.5” system:r = 2.5/2r^2 = 1.5625Area = 2 x (Pi x 1.5625) = 9.818 square inchesThose 2 look familiar ... assuming Pi to three decimal places. ... reference gauge for accuracy ...I used Windows calc to come up with those numbers...for best comparison etc... Use scientific mode, find the blue 'pi' button and you'll get Pi as this: 3.1415926535897932384626433832795Use as many decimal places as you can in the working, then do the 3dp conversion in the final answer.Well worth sticky
qik1 Legacy Donating Member 2,720 Member For: 18y 4m 10d Gender: Male Location: Loitering in SEQ Posted 31/10/09 02:16 AM Posted 31/10/09 02:16 AM does someone want to have a crack at the twin 3' option. Im looking at the twin manta system would be interesting eo compare to a 4' system 1
Johnny G Team Grandpa Qualified Legacy Donating Member 809 Member For: 21y 7m 8d Gender: Male Location: Brisbane North. Posted 31/10/09 02:23 AM Author Posted 31/10/09 02:23 AM (edited) Take the single 3" system, and double it. The number is equivalent to the volume of the west chamber of the Jenolan Caves. Edited 31/10/09 02:25 AM by Johnny G
sexual harrassment panda I see a red door and I want to paint it black Legacy Donating Member 5,919 Member For: 16y 10m 26d Gender: Male Location: Far north queensland Posted 31/10/09 09:49 AM Posted 31/10/09 09:49 AM I love how 4" is getting too small.John, There is some 5" stainless exhaust pipe at work twin 3" = 14.1385" = 19.635 square inches
qik1 Legacy Donating Member 2,720 Member For: 18y 4m 10d Gender: Male Location: Loitering in SEQ Posted 31/10/09 10:49 AM Posted 31/10/09 10:49 AM well that same day we do your cooler we can build an exhaust. you weld I'll pass the stubs. lol.
ravenhard Legacy Donating Member 1,517 Member For: 18y 6m 18d Gender: Male Location: Blacktown! Posted 01/11/09 11:54 AM Posted 01/11/09 11:54 AM So is 2x2.25" the stock system size?
Mr Man Mad Scientist Member 816 Member For: 21y 9m 23d Gender: Male Location: Vic Posted 01/11/09 02:04 PM Posted 01/11/09 02:04 PM yes Ravenhard it is
-MIX- Inactive Members 1 Member For: 16y 9m 2d Gender: Male Location: QLD Mackay Posted 19/12/09 05:20 AM Posted 19/12/09 05:20 AM hey guys there is another factor u gotta think about the frictional area of the pipeExample one : 2.5" pipe 1 foot long frictional area = 94.24" square Example two : dual 2.5" 1 foot long frictional area = 188.48" squareExample three: 3.5" pipe 1 foot long frictional area = 131.94" squareif u compare a dual 2.5" (9.818 square inches) agains a single 3.5" (9.622 square inches) system the cross section is nearly the same but in a single 3.5" the exhaust gas got less area to " rub " on compared to the dual 2.5" so it will flow better than a dual 2.5" Cheers MIX
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now