Septimus New Member 17 Member For: 14y 2m 12d Posted 28/09/12 01:03 AM Posted 28/09/12 01:03 AM FG XR6T2011FebA6NoSo far it looks like all F6s have em and early BA turbos.
Ralph Wiggum Moar Powar Babeh Legacy Donating Member 19,334 Member For: 21y 8d Gender: Male Location: Perth Posted 28/09/12 01:11 AM Author Posted 28/09/12 01:11 AM Edit:" ^ oh yeah, what he said.Nup, I can see a patern, Early BA's and Late model FPV's are emerging as consistant Yes's.Can't quite say all F6's as we dont have enough ba/f f6's in the mix yet.
Kroozin Menace Legacy Donating Member 1,990 Member For: 15y 5m 10d Gender: Male Location: Sydney Posted 28/09/12 01:18 AM Posted 28/09/12 01:18 AM BF1 Xr6 turbo2005OctM6No
Bellato Legacy Donating Member 2,713 Member For: 15y 11m 12d Posted 28/09/12 01:31 AM Posted 28/09/12 01:31 AM Thinking the same as Ralph. Maybe the early turbo's came out with them then Ford decided to cut costs, But they put them in the FPV range probably because of the upgraded suspension and the fact that being FPV it gives the cars something more over Falcon's. But yea interesting to see if B series FPV's had them.Im 90% sure my old man's December 2005 BF GT-P has it because when he got it wheel aligned the other day and he got the rear set up as if there were 5 people and luggage in the car and they adjusted the camber to do this so I'm assuming all FPV's have it then?
senna_T Forged Member Legacy Donating Member 15,818 Member For: 19y 7m 24d Gender: Male Location: SW Sydney Posted 28/09/12 01:34 AM Posted 28/09/12 01:34 AM that's not a perfect indicator though, all the XR8's I've seen have had the adjustment which is why I was of the opinion that all V8 product got it.
Ralph Wiggum Moar Powar Babeh Legacy Donating Member 19,334 Member For: 21y 8d Gender: Male Location: Perth Posted 28/09/12 01:50 AM Author Posted 28/09/12 01:50 AM Forget about the 8's as the conclusion from P@'s extensive experience with them is that they all have them.
Bellato Legacy Donating Member 2,713 Member For: 15y 11m 12d Posted 28/09/12 02:34 AM Posted 28/09/12 02:34 AM Fair call, we'll stick to 6T's
Ciaran Thooperrrrrrr Legacy Donating Member 2,768 Member For: 15y 2m 29d Gender: Male Location: NOR, Western Australia Posted 28/09/12 02:47 AM Posted 28/09/12 02:47 AM I think that the cost cutting theory fits the best.All early BA's so far have had them, and FG F6's have had them but not G6E's.Knowles' BF F6 had them so that's a minor indication that all FPV's have them although we'd need a few more to confirm.
discostig Manual mode ________________________ All day, erryday Legacy Donating Member 13,798 Member For: 18y 10m 7d Gender: Male Location: Probably above atmospheric pressure Posted 28/09/12 04:23 AM Posted 28/09/12 04:23 AM Question is, which is better for burnouts 2
senna_T Forged Member Legacy Donating Member 15,818 Member For: 19y 7m 24d Gender: Male Location: SW Sydney Posted 28/09/12 04:25 AM Posted 28/09/12 04:25 AM Pretty sure more neg camber is good for low power burnouts, less negative camber is better for high power burnouts because there's more smoke.....Uh, oh I mean ahhh, keep it on topic you guys!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now