SteveJH Member 52 Member For: 16y 8m Gender: Male Location: Newcastle, NSW Posted 11/02/11 11:36 AM Posted 11/02/11 11:36 AM (edited) It would be interesting to see what time a territory with that engine in it would get, even with the extra weight. Edited 11/02/11 02:20 PM by Dagabond
Samboc Legacy Donating Member 65 Member For: 15y 10m 13d Gender: Male Location: Merimbula Posted 11/02/11 11:56 AM Posted 11/02/11 11:56 AM Anyone got one??
icer Banned 2,335 Member For: 17y 1m 30d Gender: Male Location: Aspendale, Vic. Posted 11/02/11 02:33 PM Posted 11/02/11 02:33 PM for all those who are unaware, ford will announce later this year that they will stop the rear-wheel production line in the upcoming years. 4wd and fwd. bloody euro crap.
SteveJH Member 52 Member For: 16y 8m Gender: Male Location: Newcastle, NSW Posted 11/02/11 03:20 PM Posted 11/02/11 03:20 PM @ *Beep*, still hasnt been confirmed. Fairly sure the latest announcement was that they wont decide until later in the year?@ Dagobert, I'll try to remember to hit "add reply" and not "reply to post" or whatever its called.
discostig Manual mode ________________________ All day, erryday Legacy Donating Member 13,798 Member For: 18y 9m 22d Gender: Male Location: Probably above atmospheric pressure Posted 12/02/11 06:19 AM Posted 12/02/11 06:19 AM Seems to me that 2 wheel drive ( rear wheels ) are reaching their limit.Time Ford etc changed to constant 4 WD.The limit with 2 wheels ( 0 -100 ) is about 5 secs.Many exotic 4 WD cars are closer to 3 secsFWIW I measured about 4.6 seconds via XCAL3 logging in my XR on a normal road surface and cheap KU31 street tyres. Never measured on the strip when I ran my low 12's and 11.9.http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff91/phyber83/The%20T/0-110317rwkw.pngI'd LOVE to see an AWD setup though, only problem would be extra weight and cost.
Samboc Legacy Donating Member 65 Member For: 15y 10m 13d Gender: Male Location: Merimbula Posted 12/02/11 09:19 AM Posted 12/02/11 09:19 AM 4.6 - I'm impressed.Although I stand by my general theme. There must be a point where traction limits acceleration with RWD cars ( Normal tyres / street conditions ). Maybe a more sophisticated Traction System that optimizes torque to wheel spin. Say - 10 ms of wheel spin not the second or two in the XR's. ???AWD still seem the best solution.
bunna Legacy Donating Member 813 Member For: 20y 22d Posted 12/02/11 09:28 AM Posted 12/02/11 09:28 AM for all those who are unaware, ford will announce later this year that they will stop the rear-wheel production line in the upcoming years. 4wd and fwd. bloody euro crap.For all those who are unaware, nothing has been decided yet.
01txr Member 861 Member For: 19y 8m 2d Gender: Male Location: QLD Posted 12/02/11 10:04 AM Posted 12/02/11 10:04 AM Just getting thoughs here. you know how ford has a few cars over in Swiss land and 1 rumoured as a GTHO, what better place to test for power down in slippery snowy Icey conditions?Ford know they have a winner with the new coyote, they know the 2 wheel drive platform isAt it's limit for power down and durability, they know a lot of euro companies are developing awd systems with the front axle powered by petrol or electric. That is the future and to be moving ahead, is to start developing a awd platform. Once they have developed it they can easily offer cheaper front or rear wheel drive versionsAs it's only a mater of taking the drive away from either end. With the likes of say a GTHO or equivalent they may start to look at lightening, billet aluminium suspensions, carbon fibre panels and body kits etc. Now that would be orsm, same weight as we are running now or lighter with awd and that little coyote monster. Better start saving for the 2012-2015 GTHO Falcon FH-S (Ford Henry-Special)Just back on the Herrod 8If I was them and there was problems with track conditions or humidity I would not allow Motor Magazine publish times until proper testing was done. Like come on those times are real pathetic for that power and considering it's running 285's rear and not sure think it had suspension done also and yet still not able to run better times then standard. My last run in my BA before the rod broke, I was running smaller tyres, near same humidity, had fuel surge in 3rd, got off it slowly back into it in 4th and still went 12.9 at 116mph, also was a slow 60ft of 2.4 due to traction and it being a manual. Also ran it with 2/3 tank of fuel, full street trim with spare, jack and my heavy 112kg weight. Considering XFT and another have both done sub 12's on tune only, Herrod looks bad. If I was them and want to promote the product I would be running it at every meet so they can show it's capability, and rectify the bad exposure it's already copped. No one is going to pay $15g plus for a car to go slower.
cranny Legacy Donating Member 123 Member For: 18y 5m 18d Gender: Male Location: Sydney NSW Posted 12/02/11 11:19 AM Author Posted 12/02/11 11:19 AM Forget AWD, Rear wheel drives actually handle better its been proven Formula ones V8 supercars most of your motor sports run RWD except Rally.AWD tend to understeer. most Ferraris are RWD they manage pretty good times forget AWD most super cars manage awsome 0-100 on RWD aston Martin, Mercedes c63 e55 BMW M3 etc you get the picture.
Samboc Legacy Donating Member 65 Member For: 15y 10m 13d Gender: Male Location: Merimbula Posted 12/02/11 11:38 AM Posted 12/02/11 11:38 AM (edited) Most of the fast RWD cars tend to have the engine in the back seat ???Not to many 4 door passenger cars Edited 12/02/11 11:46 AM by Samboc
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now