January 8, 200620 yr #21 My two times were not done on the same night, so can't be of DIRECT comparrison, the dyno runs were done on the same day though, within 5 mins of each other. Once I have backed up both tunes at the track, I'll post up a bit of an article. . When I get new tyres ( shortly ) and my manifold fixed ( leaky turbo on wogs run ) then I'll run them back to back on the same night..I can see/feel the difference throughout the rpm range, and both have to be 'worked' differently to get the best out of them. time......... not that I have alot spare of atmo..
January 8, 200620 yr #22 Basically the fundamental diffrence between Edit and Piggy back. All in the "how" the power is delvered.Exactly.
January 9, 200620 yr #23 Hi All;This is my first post on this forum, but I couldn't resist this topic. I have a 2004 MKI T5 XR6T which I purchased second hand in October last year. Been checking the site since then and have learnt a lot. You guys are obviously passionate about these cars.Jordak this is a great topic for someone like me looking at options for modifications. I have decided on the edit, but from wat I can tell not all edits are the same and you have very clearly shown the options here. My preference would be for option B, maybe with a slightly lower peak power of about 240 rwkw. For a given speed (RPM) the engine can only deliver more power through an increase in torque, and this is shown via the higher boost pressures. The reason I got an XR6T was as an alternative to the more expensive XR8 (more than happy with the T though), so this "torqueness" and in gear "low down" power I think would simulate this nicely.Again great siteCheers Matt
January 9, 200620 yr #24 Hi All;This is my first post on this forum, but I couldn't resist this topic. I have a 2004 MKI T5 XR6T which I purchased second hand in October last year. Been checking the site since then and have learnt a lot. You guys are obviously passionate about these cars.Jordak this is a great topic for someone like me looking at options for modifications. I have decided on the edit, but from wat I can tell not all edits are the same and you have very clearly shown the options here. My preference would be for option B, maybe with a slightly lower peak power of about 240 rwkw. For a given speed (RPM) the engine can only deliver more power through an increase in torque, and this is shown via the higher boost pressures. The reason I got an XR6T was as an alternative to the more expensive XR8 (more than happy with the T though), so this "torqueness" and in gear "low down" power I think would simulate this nicely.Again great siteCheers Matt<{POST_SNAPBACK}>option b = goodbye t5
January 9, 200620 yr #25 I was talking to the guy from CAPA at the Summernats and he reckons that tuners (didn't say what ones) are telling him that a custom tune (presumably on an otherwise stock XRT) is only gaining about 3kw compared to a generic out of the box tune.
January 9, 200620 yr #26 xrboss8The T5 is a concern and that's why I would want to limit max power to about 240rwkw. However, I think you are correct in that the T5 will be the limiting factor in my modification journey, maybe I'll end up with something in between option A option B. CheersMatt.
January 9, 200620 yr #27 Author xrboss8The T5 is a concern and that's why I would want to limit max power to about 240rwkw. However, I think you are correct in that the T5 will be the limiting factor in my modification journey, maybe I'll end up with something in between option A option B. CheersMatt.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>The whole point of the topic is to get people thinking about what they want (other than maximum power) before they get a custom tune. I guess in your case it's served it's purpose.Any decent tuner with adequate experience with manual T's should be able to give you a tune somewhere between A & B that's safe for the T5 and clutch.
January 9, 200620 yr #28 Any decent tuner with adequate experience with manual T's should be able to give you a tune somewhere between A & B<{POST_SNAPBACK}>In theory....................... With all things being created equal, and all parts being accomadating. I can now pretty much pick out a C&V tune, Extreme tune and a Nizpro tune, generally by looking at the graphs. Have a look around at the ones posted up, they all have the same tell tale tendancies. Edited January 9, 200620 yr by F6 UTE
January 9, 200620 yr #29 so when I get my car tuned shortly, I should be looking for a dyno print out that looks more like the "B" map.Is that correct? or do I tell the tuner what I would like to see?
January 10, 200620 yr #30 so when I get my car tuned shortly, I should be looking for a dyno print out that looks more like the "B" map.Is that correct? or do I tell the tuner what I would like to see?<{POST_SNAPBACK}>You always tell the tuner what you want.You pay for exactly that!! ( CUSTOM ) tune remember....Watch it get run up stock, have a look at it, they tune. They chat with you and tell them your limits of boost/afr's ( If u have any ) then look at the graph when finished.They should be able to maipulate the curve to suit your driving style. I like mid range puch, so Tune B is good. For the drags, Tune A is probably a bit better as you won't go up in smoke off the line.They can adjust boost tables etc to bring it on sooner/later or adjust boost per % of throttle position, so you can have a progressive wallop, or get full boost from 10% throttle position. Full boost from 10% or so is too touchy on the foot and doesn't allow too much for sedate driving styles. Full boost from 10% throttle feels quicker, but it's not ( Tune B )It's all about what you like and want, so know what you want before you pay for something and get delivered what you don't. Make sense??Sorry, getting late.
Create an account or sign in to comment