Jump to content

Do you think its a good Idea?  

308 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 18y 14d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Sydney

BMW is a little different to you usual twin turbo setup. It has one small and one bigger turbo the small turbo brings boost nice and early and the bigger turbo takes over higher in the rev range. Not sure exactly how it's set up.

Similar to Volkswagen's twin charge setup but they use a supercharger and a turbo.

  • Replies 211
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 15y 10m 20d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Wellington New Zealand

BMW use a sequential system, small turbo down low, big one kicking in further up the range.

The Nissans have always used a parallel system in GTRs & 300Zs. Even on the GTR inline sixes they had two exhaust manifolds, one for the front 3 cyls, one for the rear 3 with a turbo attached to each.

The point I am making here is the the argument for twin turbos (particularly parallel) is much less valid now than it was 20 years ago when the first of the GTRs came out.

Without making too fine a point, drive a stock GTR with in line six and twin turbos, then drive an XR6T. I am not interested in which is the better car, that's really not the point. What is relevant is that the GTR is delivering useable boost far later than the XR6T.

  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 18y 6m
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Sydney

BMW stats: 400 Nm of torque between 1,300 rpm and 5,000 rpm. Note that the red line is 7100 rpm, higher than our cars.

To have a twin turbo for the purposes of driveability, rather than outright power and an irrelevant to some time down the quarter mile, would be the reasons someone might go ahead and do it. If only I had the disposable income to throw at it :(

  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 18y 6m
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Sydney

One other point, the BMW petrol engine uses parallel trubos, the diesel engine uses sequential...and comes on peak torque later than the petrol.

GTR is 2.6 litre...it would need 2 tiny turbos to come on as early as a 4 litre. The BMW is a 3 litre engine though comes on much earlier than a 4 litre...all depends on turbo size.

Edited by xr_velocity
  • Hey guys, Tab is here... Oh i feel sick
  • Lifetime Members
  • Member For: 16y 11m 7d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: sunshine coast

we can all be goats though

  • Bored Member
  • Administrator
  • Member For: 22y 5m 16d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Dé·jà vu
whats the point when you can get 9 seconds out of a single turbo

Take a 335i for a drive....

Previous thread here

Previous? :blink:

  • Sucker
  • Moderating Team
  • Member For: 21y 5d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Brisbane

Oh...stuck in an endless loop. :blink:

Try this one then

Is it a bird, is it a plane, no it's mergemaster Dags....no thread shall remain untouched.

  • Member
  • Member For: 16y 1m 7d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: QLD
atm on the skyline forum, there is a comparison between a single 3582r and twin 2835 low mounts. it is on a 2.6ltr. the 35 is a clear winner imo. go single 4 eva.

I’m all for single turbos but a GT3582R vs 2x GT2835R's is not an even match.

1x GT3582R = 650hp worth of flow

2x GT2835R's = over 800hp of flow

Twin GT2560R's vs single GT3582R would be a more accurate comparison.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
  • Create New...
'