Dingah, That's probably one of the great things about an open forum. Everyone can express their views and share their experiences with others. It is then up to the reader make up their own mind. I agree that both edit and unichip are excellent methods for extracting additional performance out of XR T's. I, however, believe that one has distinct advantages over the other. As for the achieved results. I can and will only comment on results which I have witnessed for myself. I have now seen a number of cars tuned to power levels higher than what you believe can be achieved on standard injectors (and valve springs for that matter). I've seen the results run on more than 1 dyno, neither of which is owned by the tuner, so my belief is that this takes the "happy dyno" factor out of the equasion. One of those cars is my own. It made over 260RWKW on 8PSI and more at higher boost levels. I have a new set of injectors sitting on the shelf ready to go. I've left them off as the tuner was able to safely get the power to the T5's limits without them. How are these results possible? I don't know. I'm not a tuner. All I can comment on are the end results. Whether you choose to believe them is up to you. Based on the changes to your signature you don't, but that's OK. As long as we are both happy with the amount of money spent for the results we have achieved. Based on your previous signature, your Phase II power output is excellent. I remember the very first Qld XR 6T Dyno day, where the Phase 2 ute produced a little over 240RWKW. Knowledge and experience has been able to extract significant gains from the hardware since then. The world moves on. Cheers