Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Member
  • Member For: 18y 7m 12d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Gympie
Posted (edited)

I went from 3.45 to 3.73 with my 5 spd manual and I havent noticed any difference in the fuel economy. It is a lot beter to drive with the lower ratio so much more acceleration. I cant be certain but I would think 4.11 might be too low to have as a daily driver, I could be wrong though. Mine is a turbo though I didnt realise we were talking about N/A

Edited by jared87
  • Member
  • Member For: 18y 26d
Posted

yeah alot of the people who have spoken have turbo's :) but, in theory it should be the same, if the lower ratio doesnt effect fuel economy on a turbo I should think it wouldnt have a totally different effect on an na.

  • Member
  • Member For: 19y 9m 13d
Posted

With a turbo, I wouldn't go 4.11's as you want to build boost, shorter ratios won't help that. Going to 3.73 from 3.45 will give you better acceleration in a turbo because you will launch better (on the street) without having to be on boost.

With the 4.11's in my NA6, the fuel economy went up a little bit, but mainly because I was giving it more of a caning. Top speed is reduced, but I could still hit 190kph. How fast do you need to go?

Here is a 0-100kpm video of my NA6...

  • Member
  • Member For: 19y 9m 13d
Posted

My NA6 would beat my turbo off the line, of course my turbo would catch and pass it pretty quickly once the boost kicked in but at traffic light acceleration tests, it was a monster.

  • Azzman
  • Member
  • Member For: 18y 2m 17d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Melbourne
Posted

Have you done any other major mods to your NA6 Doogstar? like cams or head work or anything?

  • Member
  • Member For: 19y 9m 13d
Posted

Well its back to stock now as I am going to sell it. But it had 4.11's, 3000rpm Hi-stall, Extractors and Exhaust, BPR Airbox, Underdrive and custom tune. It was unopened, next stage was cams and headwork but I decided at that point that I was better off to go turbo.

  • Azzman
  • Member
  • Member For: 18y 2m 17d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Melbourne
Posted

ah yes fair enough then, enjoying the turbo more than the NA?

  • Member
  • Member For: 18y 26d
Posted

only 2 years till I can drive turbo :( well, might be able to just drop a better engine in there by then, fg turbo engine maybe.. or maybe just buy an fg if my loan is paid off by then, probs the easier way to go.. but they look stupid.

but I know a fair few guys who prefer to make power out of their n/a rather than a turbo, due to the challenge. its to easy to make power out of a turbo.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...