chrisxr8 Legacy Donating Member 64 Member For: 20y 7m 19d Gender: Male Location: Sunny Coast Posted 11/11/06 03:37 AM Posted 11/11/06 03:37 AM had my car tuned bout 2 weeks ago now got 264 rwkw. not bad, but not really wot I was hoping for. the tuner said he didnt wont to go any further because he thought the valve springs were failing. he said it still felt like it had a far bit in it. just wondering if any one else has had the same prob in a late series 2 ( I thought they had the upgraded springs by then).
RAP1D Member Legacy Donating Member 3,739 Member For: 20y 4m 4d Gender: Male Location: Sydney NSW Posted 11/11/06 03:51 AM Posted 11/11/06 03:51 AM (edited) Nah springs still get soft on mk2's. But that seems low for your listed mods, mine did 265 on edit alone Edited 11/11/06 03:52 AM by RAP1D
chrisxr8 Legacy Donating Member 64 Member For: 20y 7m 19d Gender: Male Location: Sunny Coast Posted 11/11/06 04:16 AM Author Posted 11/11/06 04:16 AM Nah springs still get soft on mk2's. But that seems low for your listed mods, mine did 265 on edit alone←that's what I thought a bit low. it was a half assed tune to get me home from brissie in the end. I wanted it done properly but had some intake pipe probs. but still didnt think I would have been running into sring probs at this power. if I have to change them it could be a blessing though ill do the exhaust and pump while im at it and chase even more power.he said because of the rough idle after the power run that he suspected the springs but I have always had a rough idle and I was yet to plumb idle hose back to intake.
Paul@eliteauto Member 843 Member For: 20y 23d Gender: Male Location: Brisbane Posted 11/11/06 04:35 AM Posted 11/11/06 04:35 AM You should be getting more than that easy with those mods.
chrisxr8 Legacy Donating Member 64 Member For: 20y 7m 19d Gender: Male Location: Sunny Coast Posted 11/11/06 04:39 AM Author Posted 11/11/06 04:39 AM You should be getting more than that easy with those mods.←yeh I thought maybe the 300 mark would have made me happy.only running 12 psi and he said the fuel ratio was spot on.
ROLMDL role model Member 1,111 Member For: 20y 6m 13d Gender: Male Location: Melbourne,S.E Posted 11/11/06 05:20 AM Posted 11/11/06 05:20 AM who tuned it?
F6 UTE - Track Bound EVO III - Member 3,367 Member For: 21y 9m 8d Gender: Male Location: Strapped in and holding on Posted 11/11/06 06:00 AM Posted 11/11/06 06:00 AM For a manual, that's an ordinary result..You got a dyno graph??
JimmyXR6T04 Member 1,299 Member For: 21y 3m 3d Location: Canberra Posted 11/11/06 06:08 AM Posted 11/11/06 06:08 AM you re-gapped your plugs mate?? my car made around 260rwkw, and then with a very similar tune after further re-gapping of the plugs, it made 304rwkw.
chrisxr8 Legacy Donating Member 64 Member For: 20y 7m 19d Gender: Male Location: Sunny Coast Posted 11/11/06 07:58 AM Author Posted 11/11/06 07:58 AM plugs gapped and yes it is a very average result.im not posting this because I think its a great result (was expecting 300+) its because of the fact that I was told my springs were failing. this seems odd to me at this power level for a sep 2005 mk2.
chrisxr8 Legacy Donating Member 64 Member For: 20y 7m 19d Gender: Male Location: Sunny Coast Posted 11/11/06 08:01 AM Author Posted 11/11/06 08:01 AM who tuned it?←I think it may have been one of there first xr6ts but I know they are very good with ls1 tunes and with no probs I had on the day, would prob ly be very good turbo tuners as well
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now