That's normal.

I was getting 20L per 100kms, and was getting 197.5rwkw in an auto.

& got dusted by a cab.

Scotty

Lumpy,  you're wise beyond your years.

Lumpy, you've got wax inside your ears? :o

... oh, I see ... silly me ... sorry ... gotta do something about my hearing ...

That's normal.

I was getting 20L per 100kms, and was getting 197.5rwkw in an auto.

& got dusted by a cab.

Scotty

C'mon, stop calling my AU a cab

I'm currently getting 12-13l/klm with 24,000 on the clock.

... and before any of you morons pipe up with some inane quip about my driving style ...

That sounds about right Ken - the grey cars are proven slighty more economical because they are fractionally lighter without the topcoat

Maniac> In all seriousness it sounds like you car is now running a bit rich - causing some loss of power and your economy does seem on the high side. But it is true nonetheless that your standard car should be getting dusted by those cars you nominated.

That sounds about right Ken - the grey cars are proven slighty more economical because they are fractionally lighter without the topcoat

:k24t:

I'm currently getting 12-13l/klm with 24,000 on the clock.

... and before any of you morons pipe up with some inane quip about my driving style ...

12 or 13 litres to go 24,000k's, you do drive slowly

Scotty

Well at least I didn't bring into question your driving style

Well, if Ken gets 12-13 litres per kilometre as he says, he must be a REAL leadfoot. Some people only use that much to go 100kms.

12 or 13 litres to go 24,000k's, you do drive slowly

Scotty

Morons, morons everywhere,

If I was more tolerant, I'd actually care.

But as I'm not, as you should know,

There's nothing wrong with driving slow.

You speed from here, you speed from there.

No wonder your cars need constant repair.

Too much fuel, and too much rubber,

Oh the costs, I hear you blubber.

Well take a tip, if only once.

Drive normally, don't be a dunce.