Jump to content

Tightening Torque


arronm

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Member
  • Member For: 16y 4m 4d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Brisbane

Arron,

I would suggest that the loosening of the bolt is only the SYMPTOM of what you are experiencing......insufficiently controlled harmonics.

If it has come loose, check for fretting and the keyway opening up in the bore of the balancer. Just doing the bolt up to the required torque, loctiting it or doing it tighter will not solve this issue. If it has, this will also damage and open up the mating crank keyway. The balancer is easily replaceable. The crank is not.

Woodruff keys are just hopeless items. They break every sensible engineering rule.....(and should have stayed in bicycles IMO) as they are poor at side loads and also create stress risers with their square groove sharp edged form. A truly dumb device, yet the auto industry still use them en mass. A better way would be to use a round groove and matching pin like small outboards do to mount the prop. That way, the more load that is placed on it, the harder it is driven into the slot. Not trying to peel it out. A woodruff key just leans over and "opens" the slot in the crank snout. I would SERIOUSLY get a balancer that has more mass in the outer ring. My old alloy head turbo crossflow in my other car actually split the balancer up the keyway from the key leaning over and the repeated hammering from the harmonics.....balancer was too light and not capable of damping all loads it should. It was split that much, you could put it on and off the crank by hand. At the same time, the flywheel bolts also came loose about one turn each....and they were loctited in. I would also not be surprised that if driven hard, the timing chain may not last the full life that it should, as it will also suffer. Harmonics in an engine are not to be taken lightly.

Once it gets to the stage where the slots have opened up, stopping it from repeatedly doing it is a losing and futile battle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 16y 3m 8d
  • Gender: Male

yup +1. I would get an atomic balancer if I were u mate. once the std one has come loose its buggered. I think the atomic one specifies about 350ftlb, which is what it should be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
  • Create New...
'