28/06/11 01:34 AM28/06/11 01:34 AM #21 SLR's have fully automatic modes these days. They can be just a big P&S.Years ago you'd be right, but in the last few years DSLR's have become more of a consumer product than just a professional one.Even my 7D has P (professional ) mode.
28/06/11 01:39 AM28/06/11 01:39 AM #22 Green mode on a DSLR will look shiploads better then a point and shot....Can get bokeh... Much faster shutter speed and better depth... The camera does it for you...Does the 7D have a P? Have you used your video much Adam? Is there a way to get it to autofocus? I only tried video on mine for the first time today...
28/06/11 01:48 AM28/06/11 01:48 AM #23 Yeah. It's got P mode. I live on AV 95% of the time.I've had a little play with video on the spur of the moment. I need to have a read of the book to figure it out completely.
28/06/11 01:56 AM28/06/11 01:56 AM #24 LOL I cant even find where the video went that I took? Yeah, I live on AV most of the time... TV is great for action shots! I got one of my daughter at kinder just before... 8 shots of her jumping off a ledge... 1/500... Taking 8 photos a second it the bomb!I just bought a SIGMA 70-200mm 2.8 OS... Seems pretty awesome so far... havent tested it out fully... I think there is only slight vignetting when wide open... Need to have a cruise so I can test out the OS!
28/06/11 01:59 AM28/06/11 01:59 AM #25 Did it go into live view when you switched to video mode?The file will be in the preview roll.I can't bring myself to buy anything other than Canon lenses. I'm the biggest brand whore.
28/06/11 01:59 AM28/06/11 01:59 AM #26 My cousin has a 450D and loves it.. Hes taken some awesome pics with it, should be able to get it for a decent $$$ now.?A mate of mine uses a 7D and swears by it.. Hes more into the video side of things though..
28/06/11 02:01 AM28/06/11 02:01 AM #27 I started with a 450D before getting the 7D.I only upgraded because I wanted a higher ISO range.
28/06/11 02:13 AM28/06/11 02:13 AM #28 I was going to add that for Architectural and interior shots you are going to want a wide angle lens, and they generally aren't cheap. Also, APS-C sized sensors in your cheaper DSLR's will create a zoom effect compared to standard 35mm cameras. For example, an 18mm lens on 35mm sensor size is the equivalent to 28mm on APS-C. Also, DSLR's can be a pain, dirt on the sensor, general size and just learning how to use the thing properly. If you don't want to learn how to shoot, I would recommend something like this instead: Panasonic DMC-TZ20 Its cheap, it will still take great shots, and its reasonably compact. It is also wider angle than your general DSLR lens or P&S. Plus, you can take it places and not worry about it, or losing it so much. Trust me, when you've got a few $$$ tied up in lens/body/accessories in DSLR you will be worried about it, and will probably end up using it less. The fact that you aren't really even asking about a DSLR suggests to me that you will be happier with something like the Panny in the first place. I started out with something similar and I still use it, even though I have $7k of camera and lenses sitting in a bag, because sometimes its just easier.
28/06/11 02:19 AM28/06/11 02:19 AM #29 Yeah. It adds up fast if you get into DSLR's!I've got about $15k in gear. Can't really see myself buying anything else for quite some time.
28/06/11 02:41 AM28/06/11 02:41 AM #30 Famous last words!! I said the same until something new comes out. As mentioned a DSLR in the hands of someone who doesn't understand what they are doing is kind of pointless, as is using auto mode on a SLR.As for megapixles while yes you can get an awesome image with fewer MP's the higher the count the more flexability you have come post production.Each to their own, but I would go a mid to high end P&S over a low end SLR.
Create an account or sign in to comment