Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Silver Donating Members
  • Member For: 19y 11m 24d
  • Gender: Male

dont see why not, thought about getting a super6 but Expensive Daewoo didn't make a manual..

probably wont be as easily modded as the turbo, and I probably wouldn't trade the turbo for one, but im not repulsed by the idea!

  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 19y 4m 1d

Probably not. The words Ford and V6 send shivers down my spine. The Explorer V6 still gives me nightmares at night. I would rather buy a big cube V8 than a supercharged V6. But ultimatley I hope they can keep the inline six.

  • Member
  • Member For: 20y 5m 1d

Look, I could not care if a rubber band or a soda siphon powered the car as long as it did the right thing, however…

The issue is however that the functionality of the engine largely determines the functionality of the car,

and,

the architecture of the engine largely determines the functionality of the engine.

In short, the architecture of the engine has a direct relationship to the functionality of the car.

The ideal engine characteristics for the type of car that we are talking about, medium size, general purpose, RWD, reliable, torque plateau type output, smooth and free spinning and free breathing is best served by a medium capacity low boost turbo. The best architecture for a smooth medium capacity low boost turbo engine for a RWD car is… straight 6…

The XR6T engine was the state of the art in this type of architecture until the advent of the BMW 335i – and that is only slightly ahead. I want to see direct injection, antilag and variable geometry turbo on the XR6T before it is done – any one of those advances would put the XR6T engine again ahead of the 335i engine in terms of design for functionality.

V6 is a rough retrograde PIA.

Regards,

aa

  • Member
  • Member For: 20y 2m 23d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: New Zealand
Look, I could not care if a rubber band or a soda siphon powered the car as long as it did the right thing, however…

The issue is however that the functionality of the engine largely determines the functionality of the car,

and,

the architecture of the engine largely determines the functionality of the engine.

In short, the architecture of the engine has a direct relationship to the functionality of the car.

The ideal engine characteristics for the type of car that we are talking about, medium size, general purpose, RWD, reliable, torque plateau type output, smooth and free spinning and free breathing is best served by a medium capacity low boost turbo. The best architecture for a smooth medium capacity low boost turbo engine for a RWD car is… straight 6…

The XR6T engine was the state of the art in this type of architecture until the advent of the BMW 335i – and that is only slightly ahead. I want to see direct injection, antilag and variable geometry turbo on the XR6T before it is done – any one of those advances would put the XR6T engine again ahead of the 335i engine in terms of design for functionality.

V6 is a rough retrograde PIA.

Regards,

aa

Gees - that fellah knows lots of fancy words eh?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
  • Create New...
'