July 17, 200818 yr #61 I'm with Senna - the 300C looks like a typical yank piece of crap. Not a fan of the US styling at all. The G6ET (IMHO) craps all over the 300C in every single respect.
July 17, 200818 yr #63 hahaha I cant belive people think a 300c Is a better looking car than the G6ET. WTF? And besides the looks, the ford would be quicker in a straight line, quicker in corners, a better ride quality and even though fords interior finish isnt 100% spot on it sh*ts on the 300C finish. A mate of mine who use to work at chrysler and now works at Lexus used to say while workin at chrysler that the cars are only good for the sound and for the free fuel...! Guess what his private car is and still is to this day... An XR6T.
July 17, 200818 yr #65 Author I know it would look better lower but why are people saying only lower the rear??? its sitting level now. imo it would look bloody stupid with the rear way lower. never understood why people do that. what am I missing?
July 17, 200818 yr #66 I agree mate.. lowered to far in the back looks like ASS in my opinion.. leave that to the commy boys I say.. you want the thing to still handle so a nice low level stance get us some pics since she has settled champ
July 18, 200818 yr #67 Author yeah I'll give her a good clean up on the weekend and take some proper shots and put em up on monday
July 18, 200818 yr #69 Yeah slamming it too far at the rear is some sort of new-age muzza commonwhore obsession. It looks f*ckin stupid! Maybe they like replacing their tyres every 6 months coz the insides are scrubbed out?
July 19, 200818 yr #70 Who is making he owered springs for them?Is the pcd and offset the same as BF in 20's?I will have my G6ET in a week or so and looking to lower and new rims
Create an account or sign in to comment