tquarrell Member 181 Member For: 20y 10m 6d Gender: Male Location: Sydney, NSW Posted 20/03/07 11:53 PM Share Posted 20/03/07 11:53 PM Technically I'm not a member, but thought I'd post here anyway (can I do that?).Yesterday I had a set of headsex's injector's fitted and the car and tuned in Melbourne. The aim was to get 300rwkw's. I'm over the moon with the result but at the same time slightly disapointed. The mods are as follows:wogcoolerheadsex's injectors (mototrons apparently, ie deka copies but whatever)F6 intake.75mm gapped stock spark plugsBMC filterWalbro GSS341 fuel pumpI still have a totally stock exhaust (the car's a ba auto sedan btw)first the car pulled 203rwkw's with stock tune, injectors, pump.Then we had trouble with the injector scaling due to the injectors being slightly different (the car had 15.8 to 1 afr in the mid range, never below 14.7 which worried me) however the car never pinged which gave me a bit of confidence, but I wasn't happy with the afr's and gave 236rwkw. Turns out the pump wasn't good enough (I modified the relief valve) but it maxed out at 270rwkw with lean afrs. The pump's done 70km's and had a dirty filter that wouldn't have helped it. So next came the new pump. It was 4pm and I needed to be at the boat by 6:30 so I wasn't expecting to achive my target. With the pump and adjusting the injector sclaing, the results were as follows with afr's around .83 lambada (satisfactory, especially since it isn't pinging at 1.1 lambada on crapy Tassie fuels lol).261rwkw 8psi283rwkw 10psi299.5rwkw 14psiso close, but no cigar. I figure the exhaust would let alot more power out (even just a cat would help) with less boost but I decided against changing the exhaust to a)keep it legal, b)costs down and c)show some mercy to the bits that need to send it to the wheels.Now for the excuses. The car pulled 299.5rwkw's without the fans on the intercooler, and backed it up immediately after with 299.4rwkw (that cooler must be working well, certainly at this power anyway). The next excuse is that the dyno had just been repaired and was reading a little low. Anyway, the bottom line is I got 50% more power with these mods and I'm stoked. Total all up cost including fitting injectors, tuning, transcooler and whatever was under $2500. This is the first car I've spent money on making it faster, but the minute you step on the throttle I can certainly tell and feel where it went. The first time the tuner took me for a spin with the "small" tune, I felt myself being pushed back int the seat like I had never imagined (seriously). I can only imagine what 400 or 500 rwkw's must be like, I thought 100kws at the wheels made a big difference, 300 must be unreal. Link to comment https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/33462-i-like-this-club/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
XR06T Silver Donating Members 4,146 Member For: 19y 11m 17d Gender: Male Posted 21/03/07 12:15 AM Share Posted 21/03/07 12:15 AM congrats, sounds like a good result in the end!! Link to comment https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/33462-i-like-this-club/#findComment-511492 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dagabond Bored Member Administrator 35,722 Member For: 22y 6m 26d Gender: Male Location: Dé·jà vu Posted 21/03/07 12:34 AM Share Posted 21/03/07 12:34 AM (can I do that?).←No you cant. Link to comment https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/33462-i-like-this-club/#findComment-511500 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat-Tony Member 5,364 Member For: 19y 2m 19d Posted 21/03/07 02:28 AM Share Posted 21/03/07 02:28 AM You should be more than happy with that setup. Car I just purchased Runs Nizpro edit, injectors, F6 intercooler, and walbro intank and according the the dyno sheet I have makes 275rwkw through the stock auto. Your mid range of 14.7-15.1 if at WOT seems a lil lean for my liking as my car sits on about 0.83 lambda from 2500rpm to redline. But your making great power and you should be having lots of fun with it. Congrats Link to comment https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/33462-i-like-this-club/#findComment-511532 Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbjunior99 Member 4,359 Member For: 22y 5m 17d Gender: Male Location: Brisbane Posted 21/03/07 06:43 AM Share Posted 21/03/07 06:43 AM Nice work mate, enjoy the new power Link to comment https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/33462-i-like-this-club/#findComment-511628 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buf-Phoon loitering with intent Lifetime Members 13,318 Member For: 21y 9m 21d Gender: Male Location: Zombie Birdhouse Posted 21/03/07 10:22 AM Share Posted 21/03/07 10:22 AM Got any Dyno charts with AFRs/ Boost for the final tunes ?? Link to comment https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/33462-i-like-this-club/#findComment-511763 Share on other sites More sharing options...
tquarrell Member 181 Member For: 20y 10m 6d Gender: Male Location: Sydney, NSW Posted 22/03/07 12:47 AM Author Share Posted 22/03/07 12:47 AM I haven't got afr's or boost dyno charts yet, these parts of the dyno was not working, afr's were being watched on a digital read out. Final tune starts at 1 lambada, then works it way done to .83/.84 pretty quick and holds it to readline, but wouldn't mind getting a trace on a chart to see it a bit more accurately. THe tuners done heaps of these things (he had done a car similar to mine, he used that tune and just adusted the fueling and timing in the top end til he was happy).Here's a power graph, sh*t quality pic but you get and idea of the shape. It's got about 245rwkw at 100km/h(140rwkw stock), and 299.4 at 145km/h (203rwkw stock, dyno done in third gear obviously), then it starts losing power (I put my hand up once power started decreasing, no point reving it any further). Tuner put some more timing in the top end but suspect the stock cat is making it hard work in the top end.Can anyone confirm how to convert km/h to rpm? I did a calc based on the car doing 203km/h @ 6000 rpm in third (that's what the mk1 manual does in 4th, same 1:1 ratio as auto in third per wheels magazine), is that speed/rpm not useful on a dyno? Anyway according to my calcs;100/203 * 6000 = 2956rpm @ 100km/h (245rwkw)145/203 * 6000 = 4286rpm @ 145km/h (299rwkw)either the tires were slipping on the dyno, my adjustment factor is wrong or the car produces a sh*t load of power low down. Link to comment https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/33462-i-like-this-club/#findComment-511972 Share on other sites More sharing options...
tquarrell Member 181 Member For: 20y 10m 6d Gender: Male Location: Sydney, NSW Posted 22/03/07 12:55 AM Author Share Posted 22/03/07 12:55 AM to help make sense of it, thought I'd mention 50kw increments on the y axis, 20km/h increments on the x axis, did over 185km/h with stock tune (I think he did 5800rpm, busy watching afr's), stopped at 170km/h on final tune Link to comment https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/33462-i-like-this-club/#findComment-511976 Share on other sites More sharing options...
loopism Tractor Driver Member 709 Member For: 19y 3m 30d Gender: Male Location: Sydney Posted 23/03/07 12:29 AM Share Posted 23/03/07 12:29 AM Can't read a thing on the graph ... Link to comment https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/33462-i-like-this-club/#findComment-512394 Share on other sites More sharing options...
tquarrell Member 181 Member For: 20y 10m 6d Gender: Male Location: Sydney, NSW Posted 24/03/07 02:43 AM Author Share Posted 24/03/07 02:43 AM Yeah, I know, my hand obviously isn't as steady as I thought. Just figured out my printer's also a scanner (that could be useful in future lol). Anyway here's the scan.BTW driving at 100km/h in third confirms my calcs. Link to comment https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/33462-i-like-this-club/#findComment-512851 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now