January 31, 200719 yr #51 I just calculated about $150 for all the tubing, silcon hoses and hose clamps, shipping.I remmber fordwog boy saying he paid 350 something for his, so I might just do it this way and save $200 and put it towards a oil catch can oh the tape you ask.... its still there doing its job, just looks crap
January 31, 200719 yr #52 I just calculated about $150 for all the tubing, silcon hoses and hose clamps, shipping.I remmber fordwog boy saying he paid 350 something for his, so I might just do it this way and save $200 and put it towards a oil catch can oh the tape you ask.... its still there doing its job, just looks crap ←Hehe good stuff glad to here the tape is still there. I did similar to my stock one cut the restrictor off and used carbon fibre to cover the hole (dont you love contacts in the aircraft industry) a few layers of carbon a bit of resin and what do ya know didnt last a week. your special tape works better than the almighty carbon fibre :Dthat's awesome total I spent about $300 including the silicone and clamps and most of it is hanging around the garage in a sad sad state lol. If you need a hand with it let me know I aint far from you.All you need is those really thin grinding discs for the angle grinder or even better if you have a drop saw with the metal cutting discs like they use in exhaust shops it will be a breeze.
January 31, 200719 yr #53 On another note id like a 90mm throttle body on my NA any ideas?I been thinking about cutting the part where the motor and gears attach on the spare throttle body I got and getting it welded to a 90mm throttle body.suggestions people?
January 31, 200719 yr #54 Author I can't see why not... Sounds a bit easier to tune rather than mutliple throttle bodies.. flow will be good too...How can I get in contact with that company you mentiond... "Jays RPD"?
January 31, 200719 yr #55 Author Forget that last request.. found their website that you had referenced on a "fordforums" thread... (did a quick google search and found it)...There was quite a bit of work involved in this twin throttle body setup...More than I thought...You spent quite alot of time on figuring out where to run the intake pipes too... I would love to see the jaysRPD sectuplet manifold... I wonder if they rebuilt the entire bottom half of the original plenum...???I sat here last night and thought about what to do with the entire setup... Its coming to me slowly... (I have the old ford manifold on my lap and just stare at it and think of sh*t to do...)...the only part I will have trouble with is everything I would like to do involves adding extra sensors and adding some extra values to the lines in the programming...Have ideas but NOOO way of implementing it....anyways.. I'll sit and think of more...Daniel...
January 31, 200719 yr #56 Edit: Jays RPD are out of business theyve decided to calll it quits and continue it on as a hobby that's not good at all oh dear sad sad day.I just worked it out the surface area of a single 90mm throttle body is 6361mm2 whereas twin 70mm is 7696mm2 so the twin will still outflow the big single by a bit.Might be my next project though. Edited January 31, 200719 yr by Ruger
January 31, 200719 yr #57 Author that's sad... I was going to call mick tomorrow too... have a chat about if buts and maybes... oh well....looks like its our own backs carrying the weight...this is going to be fun... this weekend... I'll pull off the nizpro manifold and figure out how its designed... see if I can pull any hints from it...Anyways... catchya
January 31, 200719 yr #58 Author - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -I just had a thought I had to share... Isn't increasing the air intake on an N/A similar to increased PSI on a standard throttle body... ???think of it as say... 0.0005psi...how does the supercharged engine deal with the extra flow rates?Or are we looking at a completely separate issue of air sensor readings being taken from the actual throttle body itself?those are the questions I have... dan out... sleep time...
January 31, 200719 yr #59 Edit: Jays RPD are out of business theyve decided to calll it quits and continue it on as a hobby thats not good at all oh dear sad sad day.I just worked it out the surface area of a single 90mm throttle body is 6361mm2 whereas twin 70mm is 7696mm2 so the twin will still outflow the big single by a bit.Might be my next project though.←Have you done any manifold vacum testing to see if theres any gains to be made be going that big on throttle bodies..? Are they really that much of a restriction at WOT?
February 1, 200719 yr #60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -I just had a thought I had to share... Isn't increasing the air intake on an N/A similar to increased PSI on a standard throttle body... ???think of it as say... 0.0005psi...how does the supercharged engine deal with the extra flow rates?Or are we looking at a completely separate issue of air sensor readings being taken from the actual throttle body itself?those are the questions I have... dan out... sleep time...←The Map sensor does the reading. it reads vacuum and boost. standard map sensor goes up to 1 bar I think that's how the ecu puts its head around things. the ba map sensor also has an integrated temp sensor.When you get the manifold off get pics! I wanna see the inside.Hiddeous as for the vacuum testing I dont have access to the required equipment. if anyone does im happy to put the hard yards in and do the testing. Edited February 1, 200719 yr by Ruger
Create an account or sign in to comment