mie450 Member 5 Member For: 18y 7m 17d Gender: Male Location: The Shire Posted 18/04/09 08:05 AM Posted 18/04/09 08:05 AM (edited) Well, mine bent a conrod at 14700k's!!! Was putting out 358 rwkw's. Edited 18/04/09 08:06 AM by mie450
rspecf6 Banned 138 Member For: 18y 4m 22d Gender: Male Posted 18/04/09 08:37 AM Posted 18/04/09 08:37 AM Hi guys, I have a BFII typhoon R Spec that I am doing a couple of little things to, and basically what I would like to know is just how reliable they are? You hear about the ford turbo engines being bulletproof, and I know that the tyhoon engines are stronger than the XR6T, but I want to hear from any typhoon owners that have been running sustained, high power outputs. I would like to hear from anyone who has had a problem with their engine after increasing the power too. I wont be going crazy with the power, but just wanted to get an idea of what it does to the reliability of the engine and parts. It was dynoed at 255rwkw with just an exhaust, and since then has a shaker for cai, and is getting a plazmaman engine piping kit. probably all I would do would be bigger injectors, and get it tuned with the flash tuner I removed from my GT.what would be a safe power output for to be daily drven that wouldnt but undue strain on the motor?thanks in advance for the responses guys285ATW STANDARD EXHAUST, tune injectors ect , had to upgrade the fuel pump just to be safeno problems at this time................................................
MYF6 Legacy Donating Member 172 Member For: 21y 9m 16d Gender: Male Location: Earth, I think? Posted 20/04/09 09:49 AM Posted 20/04/09 09:49 AM I've had a BA Typhoon for over 4 years - build No 25! Its had a little over 400rwhp for all but the first 3 months of its life. It recently ticked over 100,000Km and the only smoke it makes comes from the tires! Still runs like a dream and all I do is change the oil and buy a new set of tires every year. Hope that helps answer your questions/concerns.
Erko Legacy Donating Member 1,079 Member For: 22y 11m 24d Gender: Male Location: Sydney Posted 21/04/09 06:36 AM Posted 21/04/09 06:36 AM I'll echo everyone elses sentiments......provided its done right, no problems!
A300srt8 Member 507 Member For: 21y 9m Posted 21/04/09 11:19 AM Posted 21/04/09 11:19 AM Yep mine been around the 350rwkws for well over a 2 years no problems beside Tyre wear and it still gets 8.6ls per 100kms on the freeway
Woggster Member 15 Member For: 17y 10m 7d Posted 21/04/09 10:14 PM Posted 21/04/09 10:14 PM (edited) Yep mine been around the 350rwkws for well over a 2 years no problems beside Tyre wear and it still gets 8.6ls per 100kms on the freewayare you serious 8.6ls per 100kms? that's better than a non-turbo XR6 gets Edited 21/04/09 10:15 PM by Woggster
Ace blind leading the blind Member 3,657 Member For: 18y 15d Gender: Male Location: Mt Alford, Queensland Posted 21/04/09 10:28 PM Posted 21/04/09 10:28 PM woggster I think most of our cars get better fuel economy then the n/a's do - more power = less effort to get em moving
A300srt8 Member 507 Member For: 21y 9m Posted 22/04/09 08:42 AM Posted 22/04/09 08:42 AM are you serious 8.6ls per 100kms? that's better than a non-turbo XR6 gets Yep most car are running too rich
R-SPEC You are a dead set goose Legacy Donating Member 3,968 Member For: 20y 9m 27d Gender: Male Location: Melbourne Posted 23/04/09 03:17 AM Posted 23/04/09 03:17 AM (edited) That seems a little too good for a 4.0 turbo Edited 23/04/09 03:18 AM by R-SPEC
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now