The Unforgiven Member 119 Member For: 18y 4m 18d Gender: Male Location: Adelaide Posted 25/01/07 07:55 AM Share Posted 25/01/07 07:55 AM (edited) I've been told X Force have recently released two full exhaust systems, both comprising of a 4" dump pipe and cat. One system utilises their traditional 3.5" ingle system, and the other whcih has only come to my attention over the last week is a new twin 2.5" system.Which system would be their top of the range? I've forgotten the formula to calculate whether a twin 2.5" pipe would have a single circumference larger than that of a 3.5" pipe but my guess would be that the twin might just outflow the singe. I'm curious about prices and experiences with either of these systems.Cheers Edited 25/01/07 07:57 AM by Strangled Cat Link to comment https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/32075-x-force-exhausts/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evil F6 Donating Members 830 Member For: 19y 5m 1d Gender: Male Location: Sydney Posted 25/01/07 07:59 AM Share Posted 25/01/07 07:59 AM I've been told X Force have recently released two full exhaust systems, both comprising of a 4" dump pipe and cat. One system utilises their traditional 3.5" ingle system, and the other whcih has only come to my attention over the last week is a new twin 2.5" system.Which system would be their top of the range? I've forgotten the formula to calculate whether a twin 2.5" pipe would have a single circumference larger than that of a 3.5" pipe but my guess would be that the twin might just outflow the singe. I'm curious about prices and experiences with either of these systems.Cheers←Simple: flow is proportional to diameter squared.2x(2.5)^2 = 12.5 > (3.5)^2 = 12.25Not much in, but twin system flows a poofteenth more. Link to comment https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/32075-x-force-exhausts/#findComment-490220 Share on other sites More sharing options...
NATHOON Donating Members 197 Member For: 18y 10m 22d Gender: Male Location: Sydney Posted 25/01/07 09:47 AM Share Posted 25/01/07 09:47 AM I have both systems the single sounds unreal but is a tad loud the twin 2 and 1/2 has a nice note with out the attention Link to comment https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/32075-x-force-exhausts/#findComment-490274 Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExAreSix TRAITOR Member 1,063 Member For: 22y 7m 22d Gender: Male Location: Townsville, NQ Posted 25/01/07 09:53 AM Share Posted 25/01/07 09:53 AM I was going to suggest the single would sound better.I have the single. I wish when I'm driving the car I could sit 20m behind it. I've heard it only a couple of times from behind, and damn it sounds awesome. Link to comment https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/32075-x-force-exhausts/#findComment-490278 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat-Tony Member 5,364 Member For: 19y 2m 20d Posted 25/01/07 09:57 AM Share Posted 25/01/07 09:57 AM Ok the twin might be bigger, but consider the turbulance created at the point where the single cat becomes a twin system, and also consider the fact that there is more surface area with the twin system = more heat transfer therefor slower exhaust flow = backpressure. Go with the single its not a V style engine so it dont require a twin system, its fords cost cutting using the v8 exhaust cause they couldnt be bothered designing a good flowing single system that was quiet enough to pass epa Link to comment https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/32075-x-force-exhausts/#findComment-490279 Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Unforgiven Member 119 Member For: 18y 4m 18d Gender: Male Location: Adelaide Posted 25/01/07 11:49 AM Author Share Posted 25/01/07 11:49 AM I've been told X Force have recently released two full exhaust systems, both comprising of a 4" dump pipe and cat. One system utilises their traditional 3.5" ingle system, and the other whcih has only come to my attention over the last week is a new twin 2.5" system.Which system would be their top of the range? I've forgotten the formula to calculate whether a twin 2.5" pipe would have a single circumference larger than that of a 3.5" pipe but my guess would be that the twin might just outflow the singe. I'm curious about prices and experiences with either of these systems.Cheers←Simple: flow is proportional to diameter squared.2x(2.5)^2 = 12.5 > (3.5)^2 = 12.25Not much in, but twin system flows a poofteenth more.←How much is the full systems supplied and fitted? Both have 4 inch cat and dump? Link to comment https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/32075-x-force-exhausts/#findComment-490316 Share on other sites More sharing options...
SavageF6 Donating Members 1,622 Member For: 21y 1m 22d Gender: Male Location: Sydney Posted 27/01/07 04:56 AM Share Posted 27/01/07 04:56 AM Simple: flow is proportional to diameter squared.2x(2.5)^2 = 12.5 > (3.5)^2 = 12.25Not much in, but twin system flows a poofteenth more.←Very nice work. A post with useful figures and use of the work 'poofteenth'. Link to comment https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/32075-x-force-exhausts/#findComment-490685 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evil F6 Donating Members 830 Member For: 19y 5m 1d Gender: Male Location: Sydney Posted 28/01/07 11:55 AM Share Posted 28/01/07 11:55 AM Very nice work. A post with useful figures and use of the work 'poofteenth'.←Sorry, should of said a a bee's dick more flow. What figures would you prefer. I assumed the dimensions of the two sizes of exhaust he mentioned were relevant, but do you have others in mind Link to comment https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/32075-x-force-exhausts/#findComment-491172 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now