Redhawk ....Time to lay this fairytale aside...... Legacy Donating Member 2,657 Member For: 23y 6m 5d Gender: Male Location: In the Ferry on the River Styx, not getting out just yet! Posted 03/10/05 12:32 PM Posted 03/10/05 12:32 PM Folded under the pressure huh??
malcx Member 70 Member For: 22y 8m 26d Location: West burbs of Melb Posted 03/10/05 01:07 PM Posted 03/10/05 01:07 PM need feedback ColinT is the thing living up to the hype ???
Houndie Member 39 Member For: 21y 5m 8d Posted 09/10/05 11:14 PM Posted 09/10/05 11:14 PM Ok Gent's, Whats the verdict???? Did this thing do it's job?
ColinT Legacy Donating Member 372 Member For: 21y 7m 14d Posted 11/10/05 11:45 PM Posted 11/10/05 11:45 PM Sorry guy's for the delay in getting back to you.I wanted to run the tank down to the fuel light before the refill.Generally around town and driving to work (open road 34k round trip) I get between 11.8-12.8 lt/100. This is accurate as I keep records being a lease vehicle.The first tank fill was yesterday and 57 lts for 493 klms, this equates to 11.56lt/100.So no great saving to be seen. Also Vaporate said I would see better economy if I was to use std ULP due to its density being higher instead of Optimax that I have always used. Maybe after a few more tanks I might try that.Had a trip to Melbourne and back yeasterday but haven't filled up yet. For the first time ever the dash readout showed 9.6lt/100 when I arrived in Melb. Usually at best indicated 10.2. So here's hoping.Colin
Houndie Member 39 Member For: 21y 5m 8d Posted 11/10/05 11:54 PM Posted 11/10/05 11:54 PM Sorry guy's for the delay in getting back to you.I wanted to run the tank down to the fuel light before the refill.Generally around town and driving to work (open road 34k round trip) I get between 11.8-12.8 lt/100. This is accurate as I keep records being a lease vehicle.The first tank fill was yesterday and 57 lts for 493 klms, this equates to 11.56lt/100.So no great saving to be seen. Also Vaporate said I would see better economy if I was to use std ULP due to its density being higher instead of Optimax that I have always used. Maybe after a few more tanks I might try that.Had a trip to Melbourne and back yeasterday but haven't filled up yet. For the first time ever the dash readout showed 9.6lt/100 when I arrived in Melb. Usually at best indicated 10.2. So here's hoping.Colin<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Thanks for the update Colin. Look forward to your next infomercial.Wes.
Guest Guests Posted 12/10/05 10:28 AM Posted 12/10/05 10:28 AM How about a Dyno run mate, some of us don't worry to much about fuel prices (I only drive 18km a day) so any power gain with the Vaporate?I see a power gain and Im off to the show to buy a Vaporate kit.
shockF6 Legacy Donating Member 478 Member For: 20y 11m 11d Location: Melbourne Posted 12/10/05 11:58 AM Posted 12/10/05 11:58 AM Sorry guy's for the delay in getting back to you.I wanted to run the tank down to the fuel light before the refill.Generally around town and driving to work (open road 34k round trip) I get between 11.8-12.8 lt/100. This is accurate as I keep records being a lease vehicle.The first tank fill was yesterday and 57 lts for 493 klms, this equates to 11.56lt/100.So no great saving to be seen. Also Vaporate said I would see better economy if I was to use std ULP due to its density being higher instead of Optimax that I have always used. Maybe after a few more tanks I might try that.Had a trip to Melbourne and back yeasterday but haven't filled up yet. For the first time ever the dash readout showed 9.6lt/100 when I arrived in Melb. Usually at best indicated 10.2. So here's hoping.Colinyou get better results than that from a custom tuned edit and a sh1t load more power too
ColinT Legacy Donating Member 372 Member For: 21y 7m 14d Posted 13/10/05 07:59 AM Posted 13/10/05 07:59 AM I asked Vaporate as to what type of petrol to they suggest, ULP or PULP. I have only ever used PULP. The suggestion from Vaporate was that I would see greater improvement using ULP because of the different density of the fuel there is more room for improvment in the combustion with ULP.This may explain why I am not seeing a big improvment in economy as I am already running the best fuel. They suggested I change to ULP and compare the results.I'll see what happens over the next couple of months, after all there is the 100% money back garauntee with the product. Then this refund could go towards the edit.
Guest Guests Posted 13/10/05 12:17 PM Posted 13/10/05 12:17 PM take a look at this on ebay guys, heres a new one, looks a bit more involved that a pair of magnets on your fuel line. Bugger know if what ever this one is works or not? So take a look.http://cgi.ebay.com.au/FUEL-SAVER-NITROUS-...1QQcmdZViewItem
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now