Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • The 'nice guy'
  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 20y 2m 4d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Sydney (Area around Ryde)

Spiro, if you are about ever, I'm not sure? Or anyone with Phase II MkII or other APS kit:

Do you find the fuel economy stats are still accurate?

My economy seems slightly better. I know the APS website says this is the case.....but....I am a sceptic by nature.

Is it true?

Comments?

Link to comment
https://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/18592-unichip-fuel-economy/
Share on other sites

  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 20y 6m 5d
  • Location: Canberra

I use a very advanced method to gauge any difference..

When the fuel warning light comes on at 100km to go and beeps at 80km to go...I notice the fuel needle is nearly on empty..

This is the same as what happened stock.

So, I assume the computer is still accurate.

  • Lemming No #5
  • Member
  • Member For: 20y 6m 14d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Endeavour Hills, Victoria

I dont think your trip comp is accurtate after you change your injectors to a larger size. I believe the edit can fix this issue. The best way to messure is to ignore your trip computer and just watch the gauge and note how many km you are getting from a tank.

Hope this helps.

  • Faster than any BTA,XTC,Autotech, Nizpro and Tunehouse car
  • Member
  • Member For: 21y 11m 15d
  • Location: D SHIRE!
I dont think your trip comp is accurtate after you change your injectors to a larger size. I believe the edit can fix this issue. The best way to messure is to ignore your trip computer and just watch the gauge and note how many km you are getting from a tank.

Hope this helps.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Spot on :crybaby:

  • Crusty aviator
  • Member
  • Member For: 20y 11m 18d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: ACT

With Phase II the figures are out by a factor of 32% I recall from earlier calcs, and that is a constant as it is a ratio Thus when the trip computer shows you are doing 10l/100km then in reality it is 10 plus an additional 32% ie 13.2l/100km - distance to empty is unaffected. You can of course confirm this by recording actual fuel used versus distance travleed which will show the relationship to be robust.

Dingah

  • The 'nice guy'
  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 20y 2m 4d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Sydney (Area around Ryde)

Hmmmm. Looks like it's time to start counting 'k's and adding up the litres in petrol receipts to check it out.

  • Member
  • Member For: 21y 10m 1d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Geelong
With Phase II the figures are out by a factor of 32% I recall from earlier calcs, and that is a constant as it is a ratio  Thus when the trip computer shows you are doing 10l/100km then in reality it is 10 plus an additional 32% ie 13.2l/100km - distance to empty is unaffected.  You can of course confirm this by recording actual fuel used versus distance travleed which will show the relationship to be robust.

Dingah

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

depends on which injectors they actual put in if you have the ones that they use in the stage111 its 43% and I have also ran out of fuel with 29 kms still showing on the km to empty

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
  • Create New...
'