Jump to content

General Turbo Chat


MattyP

Recommended Posts

  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 19y 8m 29d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Hills District, NSW

Ok, I think I have talked about this before on another thread.

Couple of points - no point have big power without supporting mods, including driveline and tyres.

My car is a daily street manual. P98 only, E85 is not easily accessible for me.

 

Stock turbo - lasted 5k km before being ditched.

PTE6235 with ported stock rear housing 450rwkw 21psi. A great street turbo which will push the limit of stock internals. The mid-range is incredible. Makes nice noise as well. As a cost effective street turbo you dont need anything more than this.

GTX3576 with ported stock rear housing. 390rwkw. Spools 400-500rpm quicker than the PTE and definitely feels stronger under 2750-3000rpm. But, after the PTE, this turbo just felt slow and boring.

 

EFR9174 with BW 0.83 rear housing. Way more expensive and requires more mods to fit. The other turbos look and feel like toys compared to this, the quality is unmatched. The IWG on the rear housing is a much better / more efficient design. 420+rwkw, but didnt get a comparable dyno reading to the others as was run with r888's on the back. (As an example I saw 60rwkw more on the PTE with street tyres 390 to 450rwkw). This is on pump98 at 20PSI. This thing spools quicker than the baby gtx, pulls harder in the midrange than the PTE and just keeps going. The end turbo for me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • To Loud
  • Gold Donating Members
  • Member For: 12y 4m 20d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: WA, Perth

I can only comment on two turbos. The stock standard turbo that comes with the FG.

Stock standard they are alright from factory. Once you get it tuned though, it feels a lot more alive.

only downside I had was that it lasted two years after mods and tune before the rear housing cracked.

 

I now have the GTX3576r on there and it seems lagier than the stock standard turbo, it does however have more power and those legs really get stretched at the top end of the rev range.

I could be wrong about the lag, but I can say that I have actually sat down and looked at both my dyno charts.

I am gauging it all by the butt in the seat meter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 19y 8m 29d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Hills District, NSW

Did you do other mods when changing to the gtx? Just a dump/cat/exhaust will make it laggier.

 

Forgot to say I had the stock turbo with supporting mods and a 320rwkw tune. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • MattyP
  • Cruise Control
  • Member For: 11y 11m 16d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Central Coast

Interesting the efr spool time considering the sheer size of the thing. 

 

How much did the borgy set you back?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RNS10S
  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 17y 8m 3d
  • Gender: Male

What's the difference between the 9174 and the 9180?

 

20 hours ago, sixman said:

420+rwkw, but didnt get a comparable dyno reading to the others as was run with r888's on the back. (As an example I saw 60rwkw more on the PTE with street tyres 390 to 450rwkw). 

Mine with the PTE6235 went 476rwks on the same dyno with r888's

 

25psi tappering down to just under 23psi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • To Loud
  • Gold Donating Members
  • Member For: 12y 4m 20d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: WA, Perth
16 hours ago, sixman said:

Did you do other mods when changing to the gtx? Just a dump/cat/exhaust will make it laggier.

 

Forgot to say I had the stock turbo with supporting mods and a 320rwkw tune. 

 

I have the xforce 4" dump into a 5" cat.

Then a custom split 3" cat back Xforce XR8 system

http://imgur.com/a/UWsdK

 

ID1000 injectors, PW stage 2 IC, surge tank.

I think that is some of it, not all. I hope I have all the supporting mods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 19y 8m 29d
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Hills District, NSW

Nice exhaust. If it was new with the GTX, that reduced back pressure maybe why it feels laggier compared to stock turbo.

 

1 hour ago, rednose said:

What's the difference between the 9174 and the 9180?

 

Mine with the PTE6235 went 476rwks on the same dyno with r888's

 

25psi tappering down to just under 23psi

74 and 80 refer to the turbine wheel size. The 9174 has the smaller turbine wheel from the 8374. Was chosen for quicker spool.

 

Mines a manual on pump fuel, presume at 25psi that run was on E85?

I bet it would have made more power on the dyno with different tyres. We thought there was something wrong with the car for a while, until changing tyres, the r888's were pretty new at the time.

 

16 hours ago, MattyP said:

Interesting the efr spool time considering the sheer size of the thing. 

 

How much did the borgy set you back?

Think it was around $2800 delivered with rear housing

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RNS10S
  • Donating Members
  • Member For: 17y 8m 3d
  • Gender: Male

I agree, r888's are very soft

 

Regarding the EFR, I heard a while back that there were issues with overspinning the turbo but not sure if it was the 74 or the 80

 

I wouldn't mind trying the 8374 on e85, I reckon that would be the ultimate street turbo.

 

I'm starting to get a bit of smoke coming from the exhaust when coming to a stop at traffic lights so the 6235 may need an overhaul.

 

As much as I'd like to try the Borgy, I really like the 6235

 

6235 has done around 100,000 klms now so it has matched the reliability of the stock turbo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
  • Create New...
'