The Ranga Is ...not on my xmas card list

[Buf-Phoon]

what science ? welcome to Brown town, not green

Tree farking poof( not that there is anything wrong with that)

Gillard lacks the testicular fortitude to stand up to this extremist party.

I could go on and on

[hypnodoc]

From Info wars site.

CERN Scientists Gagged On ‘Politically Incorrect’ Global Warming Data

Physicists ordered not to draw conclusions from study which seeks to confirm that the sun drives climate change

Paul Joseph Watson

Infowars.com

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

In a shocking illustration of how the man-made climate change establishment has seized control of the scientific process, physicists at the CERN lab in Geneva were gagged from drawing conclusions about data that seeks to replicate studies which prove the sun is the main driver of climate change, after their boss told them that such heresy was politically incorrect.

“The chief of the world’s leading physics lab at CERN in Geneva has prohibited scientists from drawing conclusions from a major experiment. The CLOUD (“Cosmics Leaving Outdoor Droplets”) experiment examines the role that energetic particles from deep space play in cloud formation. CLOUD uses CERN’s proton synchrotron to examine nucleation,” reports the Register.

The experiment is likely to confirm data from earlier studies which found cosmic rays are pivotal in the formation of clouds and that, “Tiny changes in the earth’s cloud cover could account for variations in temperature of several degrees,” an impact massively more significant than the comparatively minor level of warming caused by man-made CO2 emissions.

Suggesting that the data in the yet to be published study has validated this hypothesis, physicists involved in the project were gagged from making any interpretations of the data by their boss, not because of problems with accuracy, but because such a conclusion was not politically correct as it did not fit with the “consensus” that man is the main culprit behind climate change.

In an interview with Welt Online, Rolf-Dieter Heuer, Director General of CERN, stated, “I have asked the colleagues to present the results clearly, but not to interpret them.” Heuer’s reason for gagging his own scientists is that their conclusions would enter, “Immediately into the highly political arena of the climate change debate.” In other words, Heuer doesn’t want the data to circulate freely in the public domain because it presumably contradicts the notion that man is the main driver of climate change.

It goes without saying that Heuer’s approach represents the antithesis of what science is supposed to be all about, impartial observation and following where the data leads, not following an artificial “consensus” manufactured by politicians for the purpose of legitimizing a global carbon tax system.

As physicist Nigel Calder writes, “The once illustrious CERN laboratory ceases to be a truly scientific institute when its Director General forbids its physicists and visiting experimenters to draw the obvious scientific conclusions from their results.”

Despite the fact that global warming alarmists have claimed there is no link between the huge raging fireball in space that is over 100 times bigger than the earth, drives the seasons and causes ice ages, and climate change, the data produced by Henrik Svensmark’s studies shows a clear historical correlation between cosmic ray penetration and temperature.

Despite the sun’s obvious and significant impact on climate change, the IPCC refuses to include cosmic ray penetration as a factor in temperature change.

“CERN has joined a long line of lesser institutions obliged to remain politically correct about the man-made global warming hypothesis,” writes Calder. “It’s OK to enter ‘the highly political arena of the climate change debate’ provided your results endorse man-made warming, but not if they support Svensmark’s heresy that the Sun alters the climate by influencing the cosmic ray influx and cloud formation.”

As we reported in September last year, increasing public skepticism over claims that man significantly drives climate change has prompted alarmists to re-brand global warming as overpopulation.

A leaked UN blueprint for establishing global governance emphasized the need to adopt this new public relations ploy to combat the increasingly discredited foundation of the anthropogenic climate change myth in the aftermath of the 2009 Climategate scandal.

Efforts to cement a carbon tax in Australia are a litmus test for its planned global implementation, so the fact that a sizeable majority of the Australian electorate has vehemently rejected the proposals is a clear indication that the global warming hoax has largely failed.

“Political experts believe the battle to sell the carbon tax to the Australian public has been lost and the Prime Minister can do nothing to change voters’ minds on the issue,” reports the Brisbane Times.

That’s why the establishment is keen to use the threat of overpopulation, which amounts to little more than unscientific quackery, in addition to isolated weather events such as this year’s drought, as a means of forcing through a carbon tax via the backdoor.

[Smoke them tyres]

Who are the so called "deeeeeeniers" now????

How stupid of them to think that the sun would not have a major impact? I mean, where do they think the heat comes from in the first place?

They have not even contemplated that a far more dangerous condition would be severe global cooling.

I am happy to see that China is telling the UN to bugger off. The UN now have a history of going from subject to subject, inducing hysteria and manipulation where ever they go.....whilst they ignore their original charter to actually help the world with it's international issues. Probably why KRudd wants a position there...he'll fit right in.

They themselves, have completely destroyed their own credibility.

Thank christ for the internet. If we were left with the rubbish that we are fed from the mainstream media

If only the socialists would finally admit that their goal of thought control for the masses will ALWAYS lead to failure. Human nature will simply not let it.

Pride cometh before the fall.

[tab]

Reasons Why I Voted for Bob Brown & the Greens

I voted Green because I believe oil companies profits of 4% on a litre of petrol are obscene, but my government taxing the same litre of petrol at 27.5% isn’t.

I voted Green because I believe my government will do a better job of spending the money you earn than you would.

I voted Green because Freedom of Speech is fine as long as nobody is offended by it.

I voted Green because I believe that people who can’t tell us if it will rain on Friday can tell us that the polar ice caps will melt away in ten years if I don’t start driving a Prius.

I voted Green because I think illegal aliens have a right to free housing, health care, education, and welfare benefits – and the right to change our society to suit their cultural demands .

I voted Green because I believe that business should not be allowed to make profits for themselves. They need to break even and give the rest away to my government for redistribution as we Greens see fit.

I voted Green because I believe ‘enlightened progressive’ judges need to rewrite the Constitution every few days to suit some fringe kooks who would never get their agendas past the voters.

I voted Green because I think that it’s better to pay billions to people for their oil who hate us, but not drill our own because it might upset some endangered beetle or frog.

I voted Green because I want to convert Australia to a ‘carbon neutral green economy’ to create jobs – even after Spain has proven the green economy destroys three times as many jobs as it creates and leads to 20 percent unemployment.

I voted Green because my head is so firmly planted up my arse, it’s unlikely that I’ll ever see another point of view.

[Trucka]

I can't believe you voted for the Greens Tab, I'm very disappointed in you.

[XR6MUM]

http://www.slapapollie.com/

Try this

[Smoke them tyres]

Got my Juliar socialist propaganda money go round scam mail out today.

Decided that I will send it back to another truth denier........

[Smoke them tyres]

If I was a postie and forced to deliver that crap, I would overload one of those little Honda's as much as I could (the 90cc 'small block' would be too gutless....boys, crack out the 110cc 'big block' for a load like that) and then find the nearest dumpster out of sight....

Farkin hate 'em and their :spam: bullsh*t

Edited 01/08/11 12:07 PM by Smoke them tyres

[hypnodoc]

More Lies From More Liars. Our Taxes paid for this clown. What a low life POS

Do as I say, not as I do: Flannery's all at sea.

IF your dream home is right down on the water, and you had listened to global warming guru Tim Flannery, you'd be more than a little worried. Professor Flannery, appointed climate commissioner by the Gillard government, is never backward in coming forward. A few years go, he spoke of sea-level rises of biblical proportions, where walls of water eight storeys high would subsume all beneath. "Anyone with a coastal view from their bedroom window, or their kitchen window, or whatever, is likely to lose their house as a result of that change, so anywhere, any coastal cities, coastal areas, are in grave danger," he said.

Since his most recent appointment, Professor Flannery has taken the cause around the country, warning in June of a clear and present danger. "There are islands in the Torres Strait that are already being evacuated," he said. Given all that, many have been surprised to learn Professor Flannery has his own pile right on the water in the trendy tidal region of the lower Hawkesbury River, north of Sydney.

"Yes, it is waterfront and his would be one of the biggest on the point," a neighbour, David, told Sydney radio jock Ray Hadley on 2GB last week. Almost immediately, the world of talkback and the blogosphere went wild. In one chatroom, OS said doomsayers such as Professor Flannery "after having frightened the elderly to sell their seaside properties, are buying them".

According to property searches, in 1997 Professor Flannery bought one house on the Hawkesbury with his wife, Alexandra Leigh Szalay, for $274,000. Five years later -- even as climate scientists, including Professor Flannery, claimed evidence of global warming and rising sea levels was even more solid -- the couple bought the property next door, for $505,000.

For a week, Professor Flannery declined to speak to journalists about his properties, but he broke his silence yesterday to tell The Weekend Australian that while waterfront property generally was at risk, his little bit of paradise was secure for his lifetime.

"There is no chance of it being inundated, short of a collapse of the Greenland Ice Shelf," Professor Flannery said.

While his place was, he admitted, "very close to the water", the issue was how far it was above the water -- something Professor Flannery would not reveal because, he said, it could help identify the location and subject him to a Norway-style attack by conservatives.

Professor Flannery also said his warnings of a 20m rise in sea levels should be put in perspective -- that, he said, had to do with a range of factors and could occur once every 50,000 or 100,000 years.

The relevant time period, he said, was between now and the end of this century when the best predictions were for a rise in sea levels based on thermal expansion of the oceans of 40-80cm, plus a less predictable additional rise from melting icecaps and glaciers.

Asked what Torres Strait islands were "being evacuated", Professor Flannery conceded no evacuations were under way, but authorities on one island, Saibai, were looking at the possibility of acquiring land on a higher one.

Edited 07/08/11 02:04 AM by hypnodoc

[Guest XR09]

Ha ha we got a whole 110cc and 8hp

It took us at least an extra hour a day for week to dump that crap, and we don't get paid for it as it comes under unrestricted mail. I flew around tossing it faster than a horny school boy. No idea where most of it landed.

I saw the newspapers and other junk mail on the drives and thought better than me picking all that up and putting it in the box I will just throw my junk down there with it,

I have 2400 delivery points on my run. But only 1200 have residence. So 800 of those mothers are just going to sit in mailboxes for the next decade. What a fiscal waste of your tax dollars.

Even if you have No Junk Mail painted in twelve foot high pink paint on your house you have no say with that shoite either.

As for BB. No way in the world would I leave anyone around 12 alone with him for any time.

Edited 07/08/11 02:52 AM by XR09